IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i12p555-d986082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Differences between University Students in Online Learning Quality and Psychological Profile during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Nomie Sato

    (Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Emilia Condes Moreno

    (Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Adriana Rico Villanueva

    (Centro de Opinión Pública, Universidad del Valle de México, Ciudad de México 14370, Mexico)

  • Paulo Orquera Miranda

    (CMUCH, Centro Mexicano Universitario de Ciencias y Humanidades, Puebla 72420, Mexico)

  • Pascual Chiarella

    (School of Health Sciences, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Santiago de Surco 15023, Peru)

  • Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera

    (Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez

    (Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, educational systems had to adapt to the social and health situation immediately. This led to the appearance of the asynchronous teaching model. Throughout the pandemic at an educational level, we can distinguish three phases, eminently online, hybrid, and face-to-face. However, the perception of educational quality in these three educational moments, considering the psychometric profile and cultural differences comparing Ibero-American countries, has not been studied. The study aims to analyze the psychological profile, and perception of quality in the teaching–learning processes at the university stage, during the three processes of educational transition during COVID-19: online, hybrid, and face-to-face. Thus, 1093 university students from Ibero-American countries were studied. Through a questionnaire, demographic, academic, and psychological variables were analyzed during three phases of the pandemic. Data suggest that Latin American students had higher levels of trait anxiety and stress perception, as well as higher levels of loneliness, during the online teaching phase (lockdown), but higher grades and higher levels of motivation compared to Europeans. Indeed, Latin Americans showed greater convenience, and preference for online learning methods. However, during the face-to-face teaching phase, European students presented greater motivation and grades, showing a greater preference for this method of learning than Latin American students. Factors such as resilience, a more unfavorable and pronounced pandemic evolution, and greater social inequities, may explain the present results. Furthermore, the present study suggests that despite the effect of the pandemic on mental health, online education is postulated as an effective teaching–learning alternative. Indeed, online teaching models have come to stay, not as a substitute, but as a tool, an essential focus of attention on these models should be conducted in European countries, while the governments of Latin American countries ensure that the infrastructures and resources are equitable to be able to correctly implement this teaching model.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Nomie Sato & Emilia Condes Moreno & Adriana Rico Villanueva & Paulo Orquera Miranda & Pascual Chiarella & Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2022. "Cultural Differences between University Students in Online Learning Quality and Psychological Profile during COVID-19," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:555-:d:986082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/12/555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/12/555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:555-:d:986082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.