IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i8p387-d617294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Social Cost and Benefit Analysis (SCBA) in the Maqāṣid Shariah Framework: Narratives on the Use of Drones for Takaful Operators

Author

Listed:
  • Amirul Afif Muhamat

    (Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Selangor Campus), Puncak Alam 42300, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Farouk Zulkifli

    (Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Selangor Campus), Puncak Alam 42300, Malaysia)

  • Suzana Sulaiman

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Selangor Campus), Puncak Alam 42300, Malaysia)

  • Geetha Subramaniam

    (Graduate School of Business, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Petaling Jaya 47810, Malaysia)

  • Saadiah Mohamad

    (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Selangor, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia)

Abstract

Takaful operators are part of the Islamic financial institutions that are expected to achieve the commercial and social objectives by their stakeholders particularly the takaful participants (policyholders). First, this study aims to postulate a new framework to measure cost effectiveness by including the social and economic benefits of drone-assisted technology in the context of maqāṣid Shariah. Second, the study intends to investigate how the takaful industry can benefit from the drone-assisted technology, particularly in terms of cost reduction. This paper presents an early finding that forms part of a bigger research project which is focusing on the use of drone for disaster victim identification (DVI). This study employs thematic analysis of qualitative research method by engaging key informants who are Shariah expert, drone practitioner and accounting expert. In the context of emerging economies like Malaysia, the adoption of drone is sporadic when some industries such as military and agriculture are quite experienced with it; but for the takaful sector is almost none. This study provides preliminary findings that suggests there is potential of cost effectiveness for drone usage from the perspectives of SCBA in the maqāṣid Shariah framework. The main contributions from this paper are: (1) the new SCBA framework derived from the maqāṣid Shariah perspective and, (2) the application of this framework in examining the cost effectiveness on the use of drones by the takaful operators especially during disaster.

Suggested Citation

  • Amirul Afif Muhamat & Ahmad Farouk Zulkifli & Suzana Sulaiman & Geetha Subramaniam & Saadiah Mohamad, 2021. "Development of Social Cost and Benefit Analysis (SCBA) in the Maqāṣid Shariah Framework: Narratives on the Use of Drones for Takaful Operators," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:387-:d:617294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/8/387/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/8/387/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Aun R. Rizvi & Irum Saba (ed.), 2017. "Developments in Islamic Finance," Palgrave CIBFR Studies in Islamic Finance, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-59342-5, June.
    2. Shafiullah Jan & M. Fahad Siddiqi & Karim Ullah, 2019. "Maqasid al Shariah and Stakeholders’ Wellbeing in Islamic Banks: A Proposed Framework," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 11(1), pages 83-102, March.
    3. Mukdad Ibrahim, 2015. "Measuring the Financial Performance of Islamic Banks," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 1-7.
    4. Ngai Weng Chan, 2015. "Impacts of Disasters and Disaster Risk Management in Malaysia: The Case of Floods," Risk, Governance and Society, in: Daniel P. Aldrich & Sothea Oum & Yasuyuki Sawada (ed.), Resilience and Recovery in Asian Disasters, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 239-265, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojuan He & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Melike Torun & Zecheng Li, 2021. "Modeling Economic Risk in the QISMUT Countries: Evidence From Nonlinear Cointegration Tests," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Rida Ahroum & Boujemâa Achchab, 2021. "Harvesting Islamic risk premium with long–short strategies: A time scale decomposition using the wavelet theory," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 430-444, January.
    3. Soumya Sasidharan & V. K. Ranjith & Sunitha Prabhuram, 2023. "Determinants of Factors Affecting the Financial Performance of Indian General Insurance Firm: Panel Data Evidence," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 17(2), June.
    4. Mukdad Ibrahim, 2015. "A Comparative Study of Financial Performance between Conventional and Islamic Banking in United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 868-874.
    5. Rayyan Cheong Tian Ming & Nur Hidayah Roslan & Haslinda Abdullah & Rosmah Mohamed*, 2019. "Morale, Training, Commitment and Safety of Malaysian Army Infantry Officers during Flood Disaster Response Missions," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 159-165, 01-2019.
    6. Tumpale Sakijege & Francis Dakyaga, 2023. "Going beyond generalisation: perspective on the persistence of urban floods in Dar es Salaam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(3), pages 1909-1926, February.
    7. Ibrahim Sufiyan & Dr. Razak Bin Zakariya & Rosnan Yacoob & Md.Suffian Idris & Nasir M. Idris, 2018. "Swat Subbasins Parameters And Flood Risk Simulations Using 3d In Terengganu Watershed," Earth Sciences Malaysia (ESMY), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 10-15, January.
    8. Yuhua Li & Xiheng Gong & Jingyi Zhang & Ziwei Xiang & Chengjun Liao, 2022. "The Impact of Mobile Payment on Household Poverty Vulnerability: A Study Based on CHFS2017 in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Md Azizul Bari & Lubna Alam & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Labonnah Farzana Rahman & Joy Jacqueline Pereira, 2021. "Estimation of losses and damages caused by flash floods in the commercial area of Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia," Post-Print hal-03520150, HAL.
    10. Najuwa Mohd Nasir & Haliza Mohd Zahari & Rozita Husain, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review on Logistics Information Needs for Sharing in Malaysian Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Yomna Daoud & Aida Kammoun, 2017. "Financial Performance Analysis of Islamic Banks in Tunisia," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(8), pages 780-789, August.
    12. Ibrahim Sufiyan & Magaji J.I & A.T. Ogah, 2020. "Hydrologic Assessment Of Food Using SWAT As Geospatial Techniques In The Catchment Area Of Terengganu Malaysia," Malaysian Journal of Geosciences (MJG), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 90-95, August.
    13. M. Y. Safiah Yusmah & L. J. Bracken & Z. Sahdan & H. Norhaslina & M. D. Melasutra & A. Ghaffarianhoseini & S. Sumiliana & A. S. Shereen Farisha, 2020. "Understanding urban flood vulnerability and resilience: a case study of Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(2), pages 551-571, March.
    14. Mufaro Chitsa & Subarna Sivapalan & Balbir Singh Mahinder Singh & Khai Ern Lee, 2022. "Citizen Participation and Climate Change within an Urban Community Context: Insights for Policy Development for Bottom-Up Climate Action Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:387-:d:617294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.