IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i6p132-d374100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marketability Discount in Various Economic Environments. Comparison of Developed and Emerging Markets on the Example of the USA and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Radosław Pastusiak

    (Department of Corporate finance, University of Lodz, 90-412 Lodz, Poland)

  • Jakub Keller

    (Department of Corporate finance, University of Lodz, 90-412 Lodz, Poland)

  • Michał Radke

    (Department of Corporate finance, University of Lodz, 90-412 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the presented article is to compare and evaluate the occurrence and level of marketability discount in developed and emerging markets in the example of the United States of America (USA) and Poland. According to the hypothesis put forward in the article, due to the smaller degree of development and depth of emerging markets, the marketability discount obtained in the context of the initial public offering (IPO) is lesser in its extent, as compared to the case when the IPO takes place in the developed market. The authors have made a statistic and econometric analysis based on a sample of nearly 200 IPOs in Poland and 1200 IPOs in the USA. The study used an analysis of the statistical differences between the groups ( t -test), and also a linear modelling of the determinants of liquidity discount volume. The obtained results show that the stated hypothesis was correct, and that there are significant differences between the studied markets in reference to the marketability discount. The authors also concluded that the discount is not related to the condition of the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Radosław Pastusiak & Jakub Keller & Michał Radke, 2020. "Marketability Discount in Various Economic Environments. Comparison of Developed and Emerging Markets on the Example of the USA and Poland," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:132-:d:374100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/6/132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/6/132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buchner, Axel, 2016. "How much can lack of marketability affect private equity fund values?," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 35-45.
    2. (Meni) Abudy, Menachem & Binsky, Hadar & Raviv, Alon, 2018. "The effect of liquidity on non-marketable securities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 139-144.
    3. Officer, Micah S., 2007. "The price of corporate liquidity: Acquisition discounts for unlisted targets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 571-598, March.
    4. Tomasz Sosnowski & Anna Wawryszuk-Misztal, 2019. "Diversity on management and supervisory board and accuracy of management earnings forecasts in IPO prospectuses," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 18(3), pages 347-363, September.
    5. Mielcarz, Pawel, 2014. "A new approach to private firm fair value valuation in line with IFRS 13 - the concept of the most advantageous market discount (MAMD)," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 10(1), pages 1-7.
    6. Seok-Kyun Hur & Chune Young Chung, 2018. "A novel measure of liquidity premium: application to the Korean stock market," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 211-215, February.
    7. Pawel Mielcarz, 2014. "A new approach to private firm fair value valuation in line with IFRS 13 – the concept of the most advantageous market discount (MAMD)," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 10(1), pages 79-85, April.
    8. Sosnowski Tomasz & Wawryszuk-Misztal Anna, 2019. "Board characteristics and earnings forecasts accuracy in IPO prospectuses," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 55(1), pages 25-39, March.
    9. Paglia John K & Harjoto Maretno, 2010. "The Discount for Lack of Marketability in Privately Owned Companies: A Multiples Approach," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, August.
    10. John Koeplin & Atulya Sarin & Alan C. Shapiro, 2000. "The Private Company Discount," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 12(4), pages 94-101, January.
    11. Tomasz Sosnowski, 2018. "Earnings management in the private equity divestment process on Warsaw Stock Exchange," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 689-705, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomáš Buus, 2021. "A short review of literature on basics of relation between lack of marketability and security prices [Stručný přehled literatury k základnímu vztahu nelikvidnosti a cen akcií]," Oceňování, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 14(1), pages 3-24.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavol Durana & Katarina Valaskova & Darina Chlebikova & Vladislav Krastev & Irina Atanasova, 2020. "Heads and Tails of Earnings Management: Quantitative Analysis in Emerging Countries," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Abudy, Menachem & Benninga, Simon & Shust, Efrat, 2016. "The cost of equity for private firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 431-443.
    3. Waleed Khalid & Kashif Ur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif, 2019. "The Impact of Merger and Acquisition Firms on Stock Market Bubble," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 335-342, March.
    4. Matthew Smith & Owen Zidar & Eric Zwick, 2020. "Top Wealth in America: New Estimates and Implications for Taxing the Rich," Working Papers 264, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    5. Li, Lin & Tong, Wilson H.S., 2018. "Information uncertainty and target valuation in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 84-107.
    6. Michael Ewens & Joan Farre-Mensa, 2022. "Private or Public Equity? The Evolving Entrepreneurial Finance Landscape," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 271-293, November.
    7. Bayar, Onur & Chemmanur, Thomas J., 2012. "What drives the valuation premium in IPOs versus acquisitions? An empirical analysis," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 451-475.
    8. Gurmeet S. Bhabra & Harjeet S. Bhabra & Ashrafee T. Hossain, 2022. "CEO inside debt and the acquisition of private targets," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2163-2202, June.
    9. Bayar, Onur & Das, Sougata & Kesici, Emre, 2021. "Heterogeneity in the information content of 8-K disclosures about private targets: Acquirer size and target significance," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Chang, Eric C. & Lin, Tse-Chun & Ma, Xiaorong, 2020. "Governance through trading on acquisitions of public firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Leslie Rodríguez-Valencia & Prosper Lamothe-Fernández & David Alaminos, 2023. "The market value of SMEs: a comparative study between private and listed firms in alternative stock markets," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 95-117, March.
    12. Anderson Anthony J. & Long Michael S., 2012. "Evidence on Lack of Liquidity for Small Public Firms," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, June.
    13. Vidal García, Raúl & Ribal Sanchis, Javier & Blasco Ruiz, Ana, 2021. "Stock market multiples in the valuation of unlisted agrifood companies. || Múltiplos de mercado en la valoración de empresas agroalimentarias no cotizadas," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 31(1), pages 198-225, June.
    14. Shams, Syed M.M. & Gunasekarage, Abeyratna, 2016. "Operating performance following corporate acquisitions: Does the organisational form of the target matter?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14.
    15. Madura, Jeff & Susnjara, Jurica, 2013. "The appeal of private targets in international acquisitions," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 198-222.
    16. Jianping Qi & Ninon K. Sutton & Qiancheng Zheng, 2015. "The Value of Strategic Alliances in Acquisitions and IPOs," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 387-430, June.
    17. Huang, Sheng & Maharjan, Johan & Nanda, Vikram, 2024. "Liquid stock as an acquisition currency," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Nan Hu & Yun (Ivy) Zhang & Songtao Tan, 2016. "Determinants of Chinese Cross-Border M&As," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 17(1), pages 209-233, May.
    19. Gurmeet S. Bhabra & Harjeet S. Bhabra & Ashrafee T. Hossain, 2021. "Sarbanes‐Oxley Act and the acquisition of private targets," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1457-1487, April.
    20. Jose E. Farinos & Begona Herrero & Miguel A. Latorre, 2017. "Self-selection Bias and the Listing Status of Target Firms: Value Effects in the Spanish Market," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 67(5), pages 423-438, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:6:p:132-:d:374100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.