Author
Listed:
- Eri Ishikawa
(Department of Medical Ethics and Patient Safety, Keio University, Keio Research Institute at SFC, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa 252-0883, Japan
Comprehensive Research Organization, Institute for Global Health, Waseda University, 1-3-10 Nishiwaseda Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 169-0051, Japan
Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)
- Shoichi Maeda
(Department of Medical Ethics and Patient Safety, Keio University, Keio Research Institute at SFC, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa 252-0883, Japan
Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Division of Health Care Management and Public Health, Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa 252-0883, Japan)
- Eisuke Nakazawa
(Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)
- Akira Akabayashi
(Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Division of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, New York University, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA)
Abstract
The number of child abuse cases has been increasing in Japan every year. Medical institutions face issues such as coordinating with welfare offices, child guidance centers, police, and other related agencies concerning child abuse, as well as communicating with parents/guardians who are perpetrators of child abuse. This study examined the awareness and actual behavior of medical institutions regarding the support required while notifying/reporting cases of child abuse. A self-administered and anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among the staff of the pediatrics departments, emergency departments, and general affairs departments of large hospitals in Japan. Differences in notifying and reporting child abuse cases to the child guidance center and welfare office and the police were assessed. It was found that some cases were not reported to the child guidance center or welfare office despite being considered “abuse.” Furthermore, a difference of opinion was observed among staff members, especially in judging “whether abuse is suspected or not.”
Suggested Citation
Eri Ishikawa & Shoichi Maeda & Eisuke Nakazawa & Akira Akabayashi, 2022.
"Medical Institutions’ Response to Child Abuse: Survey across Japan,"
J, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:5:y:2022:i:4:p:34-511:d:974007
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:5:y:2022:i:4:p:34-511:d:974007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.