IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i2p58-d1629959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Trade Frictions Distort the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Hypothesis? A Closer Look

Author

Listed:
  • Lumengo Bonga-Bonga

    (School of Economics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether trade frictions, in the form of exchange controls, are among the main obstacles preventing the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) hypothesis from being valid among trading nations. It specifically looks at whether exchange controls—a type of trade friction—hinder PPP’s applicability in the relationship between an emerging economy, South Africa, and its major trading partners, classified by their use of exchange control regulations. The methodology used to test the PPP hypothesis includes nonlinearity through quantile unit root tests and quantile cointegration, designed to capture the varied economic conditions across trading nations. The empirical findings indicate that trade frictions may not necessarily obstruct the validity of the PPP hypothesis. Moreover, the weak form of the PPP hypothesis predominantly appears at the extreme quantiles of the real exchange rate among trading nations, especially the lower quantile, which is associated with the real exchange rate depreciation of the South African economy. This insight is significant for both policymakers and investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Lumengo Bonga-Bonga, 2025. "Do Trade Frictions Distort the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Hypothesis? A Closer Look," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:58-:d:1629959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/58/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/58/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:58-:d:1629959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.