IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v12y2024i4p124-d1541624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adapting the National Financial Capability Test to Address Generational Differences in Cognitive Biases

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Da Silva

    (Department of Economics, Socioeconomic Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88049-970, SC, Brazil)

  • Ana Paraboni

    (Department of Business Administration, Socioeconomic Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88049-970, SC, Brazil)

  • Raul Matsushita

    (Department of Statistics, Institute of Exact Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil)

Abstract

This study examined the influence of cognitive biases on financial literacy test outcomes across four generational groups: Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers. Using the National Financial Capability Test and an online in silico experiment, we analyzed how cognitive biases influence the likely responses of each generation. The results indicate that the current test format aligns more closely with Baby Boomers, who are less affected by certain biases but tend to exhibit resistance to new financial strategies. A key contribution of this research is the identification of generational bias profiles and actionable recommendations for tailoring financial literacy assessments to reflect these differences. Our approach not only advances behavioral finance literature but also introduces innovative methodology through AI-driven simulations, providing a replicable framework for exploring cognitive influences in decision-making. The findings underscore the need for tailored financial education programs that consider these cognitive biases, aiming to foster unbiased financial decision-making across age groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Da Silva & Ana Paraboni & Raul Matsushita, 2024. "Adapting the National Financial Capability Test to Address Generational Differences in Cognitive Biases," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:124-:d:1541624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/4/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/4/124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:124-:d:1541624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.