IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v12y2024i3p88-d1470094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microcredit Pricing Model for Microfinance Institutions under Basel III Banking Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Durango-Gutiérrez

    (Department of Finance, School of Finance, Economics and Government, EAFIT University, Medellin 050001, Colombia)

  • Juan Lara-Rubio

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Andrés Navarro-Galera

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Dionisio Buendía-Carrillo

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this research is to propose a tool for designing a microcredit risk pricing strategy for borrowers of microfinance institutions (MFIs). Design/methodology/approach. Considering the specific characteristics of microcredit borrowers, we first estimate and measure microcredit risk through the default probability, applying a parametric technique such as logistic regression and a non-parametric technique based on an artificial neural network, looking for the model with the highest predictive power. Secondly, based on the Basel III internal ratings-based (IRB) approach, we use the credit risk measurement for each borrower to design a pricing model that sets microcredit interest rates according to default risk. Findings. The paper demonstrates that the probability of default for each borrower is more accurately adjusted using the artificial neural network. Furthermore, our results suggest that, given a profitability target for the MFI, the microcredit interest rate for clients with a lower level of credit risk should be lower than a standard, fixed rate to achieve the profitability target. Practical implications. This tool allows us, on the one hand, to measure and assess credit risk and minimize default losses in MFIs and, secondly, to promote their competitiveness by reducing interest rates, capital requirements, and credit losses, favoring the financial self-sustainability of these institutions. Social implications. Our findings have the potential to make microfinance institutions fairer and more equitable in their lending practices by providing microcredit with risk-adjusted pricing. Furthermore, our findings can contribute to the design of government policies aimed at promoting the financial and social inclusion of vulnerable people. Originality. The personal characteristics of microcredit clients, mainly reputation and moral solvency, are crucial to the default behavior of microfinance borrowers. These factors should have an impact on the pricing of microcredit.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Durango-Gutiérrez & Juan Lara-Rubio & Andrés Navarro-Galera & Dionisio Buendía-Carrillo, 2024. "Microcredit Pricing Model for Microfinance Institutions under Basel III Banking Regulations," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:88-:d:1470094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/3/88/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/3/88/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huseyin Ince & Bora Aktan, 2009. "A comparison of data mining techniques for credit scoring in banking: A managerial perspective," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 233-240, March.
    2. Joris Van Gool & Wouter Verbeke & Piet Sercu & Bart Baesens, 2012. "Credit scoring for microfinance: is it worth it?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 103-123, April.
    3. Begoña Gutiérrez-Nieto & Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Juan Camón-Cala, 2016. "A Credit Score System for Socially Responsible Lending," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 691-701, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulf Römer & Oliver Musshoff, 2017. "Can agricultural credit scoring for microfinance institutions be implemented and improved by weather data?," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 78(1), pages 83-97, December.
    2. Pranith Kumar Roy & Krishnendu Shaw, 2021. "A multicriteria credit scoring model for SMEs using hybrid BWM and TOPSIS," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Aneta Dzik-Walczak & Mateusz Heba, 2019. "A comparison of credit scoring techniques in Peer-to-Peer lending," Working Papers 2019-16, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    4. Janda, Karel & Zetek, Pavel, 2014. "Mikrofinanční Revoluce: Aktuální Kontroverze A Výzvy [Microfinance Revolution: Recent Controversies And Challenges]," MPRA Paper 54098, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Roger Chapman Burk & Richard M. Nehring, 2023. "An Empirical Comparison of Rank-Based Surrogate Weights in Additive Multiattribute Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 55-72, March.
    6. Simon Cornée & Ariane Szafarz, 2014. "Vive la Différence: Social Banks and Reciprocity in the Credit Market," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 125(3), pages 361-380.
    7. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Begoña Gutiérrez-Nieto & Nydia M. Reyes, 2013. "A Social Approach to Microfinance Credit Scoring," Working Papers CEB 13-013, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. João Paulo Coelho Ribeiro & Fábio Duarte & Ana Paula Matias Gama, 2022. "Does microfinance foster the development of its clients? A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    9. Janda, Karel & Zetek, Pavel, 2014. "Survey of Microfinance Controversies and Challenges," MPRA Paper 56657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Anastasia Cozarenco & Ariane Szafarz, 2018. "Gender Biases in Bank Lending: Lessons from Microcredit in France," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 631-650, February.
    11. Hossein Hassani & Xu Huang & Emmanuel Silva & Mansi Ghodsi, 2020. "Deep Learning and Implementations in Banking," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 433-446, September.
    12. Juhyun Jung & Kathleen Herbohn & Peter Clarkson, 2018. "Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1151-1171, July.
    13. Gregor Dorfleitner & Eva‐Maria Oswald, 2016. "Repayment behavior in peer‐to‐peer microfinancing: Empirical evidence from Kiva," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 45-59, September.
    14. Medina-Olivares, Victor & Calabrese, Raffaella & Dong, Yizhe & Shi, Baofeng, 2022. "Spatial dependence in microfinance credit default," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1071-1085.
    15. J. Lara‐Rubio & A. Blanco‐Oliver & R. Pino‐Mejías, 2017. "Promoting Entrepreneurship at the Base of the Social Pyramid via Pricing Systems: A case Study," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 12-28, January.
    16. Karel Janda & Pavel Zetek, 2015. "Mikrofinanční revoluce: kontroverze a výzvy [Microfinance Revolution: Controversies and Challenges]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 108-130.
    17. Jorge Mota & António Carrizo Moreira & Cristóvão Brandão, 2018. "Determinants of microcredit repayment in Portugal: analysis of borrowers, loans and business projects," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 17(3), pages 141-171, November.
    18. Hering, I. & Mußhoff, O., 2016. "Dynamic Incentives in Microfinance – What about the Farmers?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 51, March.
    19. Dorfleitner, G. & Just-Marx, S. & Priberny, C., 2017. "What drives the repayment of agricultural micro loans? Evidence from Nicaragua," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 89-100.
    20. Luisa Roa & Alejandro Correa-Bahnsen & Gabriel Suarez & Fernando Cort'es-Tejada & Mar'ia A. Luque & Cristi'an Bravo, 2020. "Super-App Behavioral Patterns in Credit Risk Models: Financial, Statistical and Regulatory Implications," Papers 2005.14658, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:88-:d:1470094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.