IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i3p84-d1179478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Effective Use of State Property: Accounting and Analytical Support and Analysis Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Elena A. Fedchenko

    (Financial Control and Treasury Department, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey V. Nikiforov

    (Financial Control and Treasury Department, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Lyubov V. Gusarova

    (Financial Control and Treasury Department, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Lyudmila M. Tsareva

    (Financial Control and Treasury Department, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

  • Alexey A. Maximov

    (Financial Control and Treasury Department, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskiy Ave., 125993 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The effective use of state property is one of the topical issues of economic policy affecting the interests of all segments of society. The need to comply with the principle of the effective use of budgetary funds is enshrined in Article 34 of the Budget Code of the Russian Federation. However, while studying the existing system of financial management in Russian practice, it was revealed that the current methodological approaches do not fully solve the tasks enshrined in the budget legislation. This is primarily due to the lack of proper accounting and analytical and methodological support for the relevant management procedures. Thus, the Federal State Information and Analytical System of the Federal Property Management Agency “Unified System of State Property Management” was used as the information base. However, this information system has some significant shortcomings, such as (1) the lack of a single regulatory act on the register at all levels of government; (2) the duplicated information about the property; and (3) there are no indicators and criteria in the register that would reflect effective property use, etc. Secondly, the approaches used to assess effective state property use are based on industry standards (health, education, etc.) in relation to the property and specific equipment necessary for the provision of public services. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to improve the concept and methodology for analyzing effective state (municipal) property use. The main areas for improving the methodology are (1) to develop a unified register of state property as the main source of accounting and analytical information; (2) to assess the property which state bodies and state institutions need to perform their functions and powers in full and of appropriate quality; and (3) to develop unified approaches for assessing the effective state (municipal) property use. As a result, the authors developed proposals introducing a unified register of the state (municipal) property, which includes indicators characterizing the physical state, recognition in accounting, and forms of the property disposal and use, which can be the basis for information and analytical support for assessing the effective state (municipal) property use at all levels. The study represents a system of indicators for assessing the effective state (municipal) property use, which consists of (1) indicators of the property disposal and use that make up the state treasury and (2) indicators of the property disposal and use of economic entities in the public sector. The results of the study are confirmed by empirical studies using the example of public institutions in the field of higher education and executive authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena A. Fedchenko & Andrey V. Nikiforov & Lyubov V. Gusarova & Lyudmila M. Tsareva & Alexey A. Maximov, 2023. "Assessing the Effective Use of State Property: Accounting and Analytical Support and Analysis Methodology," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:84-:d:1179478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/3/84/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/3/84/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giglio, Joseph M. & Friar, John H. & Crittenden, William F., 2018. "Integrating lifecycle asset management in the public sector," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 511-519.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matheus B. Frare & Ana P. C. Clauberg & Simone Sehnem & Lucila M. S. Campos & Juliano Spuldaro, 2020. "Toward a sustainable development indicators system for small municipalities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1148-1167, September.
    2. Pepple, Dennis & Makama, Christine & Okeke, John-Paul, 2022. "Knowledge management practices: A public sector perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 509-516.
    3. Rogerson Christian M. & Rogerson Jayne M., 2020. "Municipal caravan parks in South Africa: geography, management and planning," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 49(49), pages 109-124, September.
    4. Savindi Caldera & Sherif Mostafa & Cheryl Desha & Sherif Mohamed, 2021. "Exploring the Role of Digital Infrastructure Asset Management Tools for Resilient Linear Infrastructure Outcomes in Cities and Towns: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:84-:d:1179478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.