Author
Listed:
- Ali B. Ishaque
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Christine Timmons
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Frederick V. Ballard
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Carine Hupke
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Kalpana Dulal
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Linda R. Johnson
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Tonya M. Gerald
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA
Neuroscience/Drug Abuse Program, JLC-BBRI, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA)
- Dwayne Boucaud
(Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Paul B. Tchounwou
(Molecular Toxicology Research Laboratory, NIH-Center for Environmental Health, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA)
Abstract
DNTs are considered possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) because there is inadequate evidence in humans for carcinogenicity though there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals. In this study, MCF-7 (breast) and MRC-5 (lung) cells were exposed to a serial dilution of 2,4 and 2,6 DNTs (control, 1-500 ppm) in 96 well tissue culture plates. After various time intervals (24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs) the plates were washed, and 100μl fluorescein diacetate solution (10 μg/ml in PBS) was added column wise to each well, and incubated at 37°C for 30 - 60 min before reading the fluorescence with a spectrofluorometer at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 538 nm respectively. Spectrofluorometeric readings were converted to percentages of cell survival. Regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between cell survival and exposed concentration. Linear equations derived from the regression analysis were used to calculate the LC 50 values. Results indicated that 2,6 DNT was more toxic to breast cells; LC 50 values were 445 and 292 ppm at 24 and 48 hours respectively compared to 2,4 DNT showing LC 50 values of 570 and 407 ppm at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. No significant differences in toxicity existed between the two chemicals with regard to lung cells. Contrary to the above observation, 2,4 DNT was more toxic to breast cells; LC 50 values were 407 and 238 ppm at 24 and 48 hours respectively compared to lung cells showing LC 50 values of 527 and 402 ppm at 24 and 48 hours respectively. No significant difference existed for 2,6 DNT between the two cell lines. Lungs cells were more resistant to the two chemicals.
Suggested Citation
Ali B. Ishaque & Christine Timmons & Frederick V. Ballard & Carine Hupke & Kalpana Dulal & Linda R. Johnson & Tonya M. Gerald & Dwayne Boucaud & Paul B. Tchounwou, 2005.
"Cytotoxicity of Dinitrotoluenes (2,4-DNT, 2,6-DNT ) to MCF-7 and MRC-5 Cells,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-4, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:304-307:d:2744
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:2:y:2005:i:2:p:304-307:d:2744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.