IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i4p555-d1627357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on an Intensive Hospital-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention in Relation to Transurethral Resection of the Bladder Tumour (TURBT): Interviews with Patients, Relatives, and Clinicians

Author

Listed:
  • Line Noes Lydom

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

  • Rie Raffing

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

  • Susanne Vahr Lauridsen

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Department of Surgery, Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
    Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2000 København N, Denmark
    Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte, 2730 Herlev, Denmark)

  • Ingrid Egerod

    (Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2000 København N, Denmark
    Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 København Ø, Denmark)

  • Ulla Nordström Joensen

    (Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2000 København N, Denmark
    Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, 2100 København Ø, Denmark)

  • Hanne Tønnesen

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

Abstract

Smoking is a major risk factor for bladder cancer and postoperative complications. Therefore, urological guidelines strongly recommend smoking cessation. Notwithstanding, many patients continue to smoke beyond the time of diagnosis. By using the qualitative methodology, this study aimed to explore barriers, facilitators, and recommendations related to the intensive smoking cessation Gold Standard Programme (GSP) from the multi-perspective view of patients treated with transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT), their relatives, and clinicians. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with eight patients, four relatives, and six clinicians in the urology setting. Data were analysed using the Framework Method. All participants perceived the GSP positively. Across the three groups, five categories emerged describing barriers and facilitators: perceptions of the GSP, pragmatic factors, health-related factors, psychological factors, and relational and communicative factors. Similarly, recommendations were represented in two categories: the GSP and pragmatic factors. While facilitators were relatively similar across the three groups, barriers were dissimilar or contradictory. The clinicians expressed the most challenges related to relational and communicative factors. The patients mainly had recommendations related to the GSP, while the clinicians’ recommendations focused on pragmatic factors for conducting the GSP. The potential involvement of relatives needs to be further investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Line Noes Lydom & Rie Raffing & Susanne Vahr Lauridsen & Ingrid Egerod & Ulla Nordström Joensen & Hanne Tønnesen, 2025. "Perspectives on an Intensive Hospital-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention in Relation to Transurethral Resection of the Bladder Tumour (TURBT): Interviews with Patients, Relatives, and Clinicians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:555-:d:1627357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:555-:d:1627357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.