IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i4p538-d1625919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergent Validity of the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test Against Two-Step and Timed Up and Go Tests in Thai Older Adults with and Without Locomotive Syndrome

Author

Listed:
  • Chadapa Rungruangbaiyok

    (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Movement Science and Exercise Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Charupa Lektip

    (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Movement Science and Exercise Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Jiraphat Nawarat

    (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Movement Science and Exercise Research Center, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Eiji Miyake

    (Department of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama-shi 226-8555, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Keiichiro Aoki

    (Department of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama-shi 226-8555, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Hiroyuki Ohtsuka

    (Department of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama-shi 226-8555, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Yasuko Inaba

    (Department of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama-shi 226-8555, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Yoshinori Kagaya

    (Department of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama-shi 226-8555, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Weeranan Yaemrattanakul

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

Locomotive syndrome (LS) predisposes older adults to falls and functional dependency. In older adults with LS, the validity of the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-LQ)—a dynamic balance assessment tool—remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the convergent validity of the YBT-LQ with the Two-Step and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests and compare YBT-LQ performance between individuals with and without LS. Sixty Thai community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years) were equally divided into LS and non-LS groups and performed the YBT-LQ, Two-Step test, and TUG test. Correlation analyses and independent t -tests assessed relationships and between-group comparisons, respectively. The YBT-LQ exhibited moderate positive correlations with the Two-Step test ( r = 0.366, p = 0.004) and moderate negative correlations with the TUG test ( r = −0.412, p = 0.001). The LS group exhibited significantly lower YBT-LQ scores across all reach directions than the non-LS group ( p < 0.05), highlighting impaired balance in individuals with LS. The YBT-LQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing dynamic balance and postural control, as well as identifying multidirectional stability deficits in older adults, particularly those with LS. Implementing the YBT-LQ in routine geriatric evaluations could enhance early detection and targeted interventions to reduce fall risk and improve mobility in aging populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chadapa Rungruangbaiyok & Charupa Lektip & Jiraphat Nawarat & Eiji Miyake & Keiichiro Aoki & Hiroyuki Ohtsuka & Yasuko Inaba & Yoshinori Kagaya & Weeranan Yaemrattanakul, 2025. "Convergent Validity of the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test Against Two-Step and Timed Up and Go Tests in Thai Older Adults with and Without Locomotive Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:538-:d:1625919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/4/538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:538-:d:1625919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.