Author
Listed:
- Drew C. Baeza
(Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL 33136, USA
Surgical Services, Miami Veterans Healthcare System, Miami, FL 33125, USA
Dr. Kiran C Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Johnathon Z. Penso
(Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Dhariyat M. Menendez
(Department of Health and Epidemiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA)
- Julio A. Contreras
(Department of Health and Epidemiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA)
- Sarah Rock
(Department of Health and Epidemiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA)
- Anat Galor
(Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL 33136, USA
Surgical Services, Miami Veterans Healthcare System, Miami, FL 33125, USA)
- Naresh Kumar
(Department of Health and Epidemiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA)
Abstract
Background: The indoor environment can contribute to dry eye disease (DED) risk, but the effects of environmental modifications on disease are still uncertain. This study evaluated the effect of home interventions that modify the indoor environment on DED symptoms and sign severity. Methods: The prospective study consisted of two visits (6 ± 1 months apart). At each home visit, indoor environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, and airborne particulate matter) were monitored and at each clinical visit, DED symptoms and signs were examined. After the first visit, all participants received a report of their home air quality and 10 recommendations to improve their home environment. At the 6-month visit, participants indicated which interventions they implemented. Results: A total of 99 subjects participated in the clinical evaluation and home monitoring at baseline and six-month follow-up. Their mean age was 61 years, and 26% identified as Hispanic. Most had mild or greater DED symptoms (5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire, DEQ5 ≥ 6), with an average DEQ5 score of 10.49 ± 5.51 at baseline. In total, 77% (n = 76) implemented ≥1 intervention with home ventilation (42.4%), air conditioner filter change (36.4%), and exhaust fan use (31.3%) being the most frequent. Overall, with every intervention implemented, tear osmolarity (change from baseline to 6 months) declined by 2% (log-transformed β = 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.00–0.03; p < 0.05), and Meibomian gland (MG) plugging declined by 14% (log-transformed β = 0.14; CI = 0.05–24; p < 0.05). Specific interventions had specific impacts on DED signs and symptoms. For example, osmolarity declined by a greater degree in those that implemented home ventilation, while DED symptoms improved to a greater degree in those that utilized indoor plants compared to those that did not implement these interventions. Conclusions: When provided with an objective report of home environmental conditions and remediation strategies, most participants voluntarily implemented low-cost home interventions, which reduced the severity of select DED symptoms and signs.
Suggested Citation
Drew C. Baeza & Johnathon Z. Penso & Dhariyat M. Menendez & Julio A. Contreras & Sarah Rock & Anat Galor & Naresh Kumar, 2025.
"The Impact of Home Interventions on Dry Eye Disease (DED) Symptoms and Signs in United States Veterans,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-14, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:438-:d:1613618
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:438-:d:1613618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.