IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i3p410-d1609669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Short Cognitive Screening Instruments in an Outreach Memory Clinic in Primary Care

Author

Listed:
  • Rónán O’Caoimh

    (Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Mercy University Hospital, T12 WE28 Cork City, Ireland
    Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork City, Ireland)

  • Sheena Cadoo

    (Memory Resource Room, Mallow Primary Healthcare Centre, Mallow, P51 Y8EC County Cork, Ireland)

  • Brian Daly

    (Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork City, Ireland
    Department of Pyschiartry, Nelson Hospital, Tipahi Street, Nelson 7010, New Zealand)

  • D. William Molloy

    (Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Douglas Road, T12 XH60 Cork City, Ireland)

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the possibility of offering outreach from hospital-based memory clinic services to primary care. Such models could potentially improve access to specialised mental healthcare. We report on the reliability and validity of a pilot cognitive screening pathway in general practice (GP) in Ireland. Consecutive patients with memory complaints attending two primary care clinics were screened and diagnosed clinically by a physician-run memory clinic in GP. Follow-up in secondary care confirmed the diagnosis. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) and diagnostic validity of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q mci ) screen was compared to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG). In all, 63 patients, 31 with subjective memory complaints (SMC), 16 with mild cognitive impairment and 16 with dementia were screened. Their median age was 73 and 67% were female. The IRR of the Q mci screen between GP and clinic was excellent (r = 0.89). The Q mci was more accurate than the GPCOG in identifying cognitive impairment; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.95 versus 0.80 ( p = 0.008). The Q mci and MoCA had similar accuracy, with an AUC of 0.95 versus 0.91 ( p = 0.117), respectively, but was significantly shorter ( p < 0.001), suggesting it may be a useful instrument in this setting. Based on these results, a definitive study is now planned to examine the benefits and challenges of utilizing these instruments as part of establishing an outreach memory clinic service in primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Rónán O’Caoimh & Sheena Cadoo & Brian Daly & D. William Molloy, 2025. "Comparing Short Cognitive Screening Instruments in an Outreach Memory Clinic in Primary Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:410-:d:1609669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/410/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/410/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:410-:d:1609669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.