IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i3p408-d1609482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association Between Census Tract-Level Poverty and Non-White Race with Location of Coal Ash Disposal Pits in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Emily A. Shingara

    (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Caroline Weinberg

    (Earthjustice Clean Energy Program, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA)

  • Tara P. McAlexander

    (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

Abstract

Coal ash is a byproduct of coal-fired power plants, and the management and disposal of coal ash in coal ash pits is an environmental health concern. Evidence suggests that socioeconomically disadvantaged communities are more likely to bear the burden of these environmental hazards. However, limited studies have investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status and residential proximity to coal ash pits. We examined associations between census tract poverty and non-white race with the likelihood of having coal ash pits within the census tract. We obtained coal ash pit location and census tract-level data (2017–2021) of the percentage of the population living at or below the federal poverty level and the percentage of the population’s non-white race for 82,805 census tracts in the contiguous United States. We implemented multivariable logistic regression models to examine associations between non-white race, poverty, and the likelihood of having one or more coal ash pits in a census tract. Secondary analyses among tracts with at least one coal ash pit evaluated the associations between poverty, non-white race, and the likelihood of having multiple coal ash pits. Models additionally adjusted for census tract region. Census tracts in the highest quartile of poverty were over two times as likely to have one or more coal ash pits (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.52, 3.25). Tracts in the highest quartile of the non-white population had 90% lower odds of having one or more coal ash pits as compared to the lowest quartile (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.17). Census tracts with higher levels of poverty were more likely to have one or more coal ash pits, and census tracts with higher non-white populations were less likely to have one or more coal ash pits, suggesting that these associations are complex and indicate an environmental justice issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily A. Shingara & Caroline Weinberg & Tara P. McAlexander, 2025. "Association Between Census Tract-Level Poverty and Non-White Race with Location of Coal Ash Disposal Pits in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:408-:d:1609482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/408/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/408/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:408-:d:1609482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.