IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i3p386-d1607147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cross-Sectional Association of Scales from the Job Content Questionnaire 2 (JCQ 2.0) with Burnout and Affective Commitment Among German Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Maren Formazin

    (Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Division “Work and Health”, 10317 Berlin, Germany)

  • Peter Martus

    (Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Hermann Burr

    (Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Division “Work and Health”, 10317 Berlin, Germany)

  • Anne Pohrt

    (Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany)

  • BongKyoo Choi

    (Center for Work and Health Research, Irvine, CA 92620, USA
    Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA)

  • Robert Karasek

    (Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
    Department of Psychology, Copenhagen University, Denmark & Øresund Synergy, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

The Job Content Questionnaire JCQ 2.0 (JCQ 2.0) thoroughly revises the well-known JCQ 1, based on an expanded Demand/Control theory-consistent platform with new scales, the Associationalist Demand Control (ADC) theory. This study tests the JCQ 2.0 in an urban population in Germany ( N = 2326) for concurrent validity of each specific task and organizational-level scale and the relative importance of the task and organizational-level scales, using burnout and commitment as outcome measures. Cross-sectional regression analyses in the test and validation samples were run after multiple imputation. Five JCQ 2.0 task-level scales explain 44% of burnout variance; three JCQ 2.0 task-level scales explain 25% of commitment variance. Adding organizational-level scales, organizational disorder and rewards, increases the explained variance for burnout by five percentage points; consideration of workers’ interests and reward add four percentage points of variance for commitment. Organizational-level scales alone explain 33% and 28% of the variance in burnout and commitment, respectively, due to three and five organizational-level scales for both outcomes. Thus, the JCQ 2.0 task and organizational-level scales show substantial relations to work- and health-related outcomes, with task level more relevant for burnout and organizational level more relevant for commitment. The most strongly related JCQ 2.0 scales have evolved from new ADC theory, confirming its utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Maren Formazin & Peter Martus & Hermann Burr & Anne Pohrt & BongKyoo Choi & Robert Karasek, 2025. "The Cross-Sectional Association of Scales from the Job Content Questionnaire 2 (JCQ 2.0) with Burnout and Affective Commitment Among German Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:386-:d:1607147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:386-:d:1607147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.