Author
Listed:
- Tomoko McGaughey
(Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada)
- George Kephart
(Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)
- Utkarsh J. Dang
(Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada)
- Paul A. Peters
(Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada)
Abstract
Multiple definitions have been used to identify individuals who are high system users (HSUs), through economic costs, frequency of use, or length of stay for inpatient care users. However, no definition has been validated to be representative of those residing in rural communities, who face unique service accessibility. This paper identifies an HSU definition for rural Canada that is inclusive of various levels of rurality, longitudinal patient experiences, and types of hospitalizations experienced. This study utilized the 2011 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC) linkage profile to assess hospitalization experiences between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013. A range of common HSU indicators were compared using Cox proportional hazards modelling for multiple periods of assessment and types of admissions. The preferred definition for rural HSUs was individuals who are in the 90th percentile of unplanned hospitalization episodes for 2 of 3 consecutive years. This approach is innovative in that it includes longitudinal hospital experiences and multiple types of hospitalizations and assesses an individual’s rurality as a point of context for analysis, rather than a characteristic. These differences provide an opportunity for community characteristic needs assessment and subsequent adjustments to policy development and resource allocation to meet each rural community’s specific needs.
Suggested Citation
Tomoko McGaughey & George Kephart & Utkarsh J. Dang & Paul A. Peters, 2025.
"Creating an Inclusive Definition for High Users of Inpatient Hospital Systems That Considers Different Levels of Rurality,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-21, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:381-:d:1606496
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:381-:d:1606496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.