IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i2p186-d1579300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Childbearing Motivations Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Gattamelata

    (Escuela de Doctorado en Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain
    Department of Psychology, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Ed.C5, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Maria Elisabetta Coccia

    (Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Giulia Fioravanti

    (Department of Health Sciences (DSS), University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy)

  • Vanessa Prisca Zurkirch

    (Maternal and Child Department, Regional Reference Center on Relational Criticalities (RCRC), Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Nieves Moyano

    (Escuela de Doctorado en Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain
    Department of Psychology, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Ed.C5, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

Abstract

The Childbearing Motivations Scale (CMS) is a multidimensional self-report measure of positive and negative motivations influencing the decision to become a parent. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of the CMS. A sample of 522 participants (27% men and 73% women) aged from 18 to 55 years was recruited. The four-factor model for the positive subscale and the five-factor model for the negative subscale of the CMS demonstrated a good fit. Reliability values ranged from 0.70 to 0.91. Both factors had evidence for convergent validity with sex, age, and relationship duration: women reported lower in some of the negative motivations to become a mother in contrast to men. Moreover, the greater the age, the lower the negative motivations for becoming a parent. Those in a longer relationship indicated lower negative motivations. No significant correlations were found for the positive motivations subscale. Significant differences were found for income levels (low vs. medium/high) regarding personal fulfillment, financial problems, and body-image concerns, as well as in cultural levels (medium vs. high) concerning economic constraints, intergenerational continuity, immaturity, and physical suffering. These findings suggest that individuals with lower economic resources scored higher across all these areas on the Negative Childbearing Motivations subscale. Our findings indicate that the CMS can be used to reliably assess the motivations for parenthood among Italian men and women.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Gattamelata & Maria Elisabetta Coccia & Giulia Fioravanti & Vanessa Prisca Zurkirch & Nieves Moyano, 2025. "Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Childbearing Motivations Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:186-:d:1579300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Mussida & Raffaella Patimo, 2021. "Women’s Family Care Responsibilities, Employment and Health: A Tale of Two Countries," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 489-507, September.
    2. Maria Elisabetta Coccia & Luca Nardone & Francesca Rizzello, 2022. "Endometriosis and Infertility: A Long-Life Approach to Preserve Reproductive Integrity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. repec:cai:poeine:pope_1102_0361 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ahmad Motawi & Andrea Crafa & Taha Hamoda & Rupin Shah & Ashok Agarwal, 2024. "The Andrological Landscape in the Twenty-First Century: Making Sense of the Advances in Male Infertility Management for the Busy Clinicians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreia Teixeira & Ronaldo Gabriel & José Martinho & Irene Oliveira & Mário Santos & Graça Pinto & Helena Moreira, 2023. "Distance to Natural Environments, Physical Activity, Sleep, and Body Composition in Women: An Exploratory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Thanuja Wijesiri & Gayanthi Ilangarathna & Wathsala Dedunupitiya & Janaka Ekanayake & Sakunthala Yatigammana & Mallika Pinnawala & Ganga Thilakarathne & Roshan Godaliyadda & Parakrama Ekanayake, 2023. "The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Women in the Households: Qualitative Analysis of Women’s Quality of Life and Mental Health," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(4), pages 610-622, April.
    3. Adá-Lameiras, Alba & Antonovica, Arta & de Esteban Curiel, Javier & Aydogan, Merve, 2024. "The impact of health crisis on sports consumption – A longitudinal study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Sieber, Stefan & Orsholits, Dan & Cheval, Boris & Ihle, Andreas & Kelly-Irving, Michelle & Delpierre, Cyrille & Burton-Jeangros, Claudine & Cullati, Stéphane, 2022. "Social protection expenditure on health in later life in 20 European countries: Spending more to reduce health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:186-:d:1579300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.