IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i2p158-d1576738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Poison Center Surveillance of Occupational Incidents with Hazardous Materials (2016–2023): Insights for Risk Mitigation and Incident Preparedness

Author

Listed:
  • Anja P. G. Wijnands

    (Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Arjen Koppen

    (Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Irma de Vries

    (Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Dylan W. de Lange

    (Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Saskia J. Rietjens

    (Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Incidents involving hazardous materials (HAZMAT incidents) can impact human health and the environment. For the development of risk mitigation strategies, it is essential to understand the circumstances of such incidents. A retrospective study (2016–2023) of acute occupational HAZMAT incidents involving multiple patients (>1, including workers, emergency responders and bystanders) reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center was conducted. We only included incidents that occurred during the performance of work or as a result of a disruption of a work-related process. Patient characteristics, exposure circumstances (such as the substances involved, chemical phase, and type of release (e.g., spill/release or fire/explosion)) and business classes were analyzed to identify risk factors. From 2016 to 2023, the DPIC was consulted about 516 HAZMAT incidents. Inhalation was the most common route of exposure (89%). Patients were often exposed to chemical asphyxiants (n = 156) and acids ( n = 151). Most incidents occurred in fixed facilities ( n = 447), while 49 incidents occurred during transport. The primary cause was a spill/release ( n = 414), followed by a fire/explosion ( n = 65). Most patients were exposed to a gas/vapor ( n = 421), followed by a liquid ( n = 59) or solid ( n = 28). Incidents frequently occurred in industry (20%). The majority of patients reported mild to moderate health effects. Surveillance data on HAZMAT incidents are essential for incident preparedness. Poison Center data can help identify risk factors, which can be used to develop risk mitigation strategies to prevent future incidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Anja P. G. Wijnands & Arjen Koppen & Irma de Vries & Dylan W. de Lange & Saskia J. Rietjens, 2025. "Poison Center Surveillance of Occupational Incidents with Hazardous Materials (2016–2023): Insights for Risk Mitigation and Incident Preparedness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:158-:d:1576738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:158-:d:1576738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.