IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2024i1p51-d1558117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waste and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Produced from Ophthalmic Surgeries: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Morris

    (NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA)

  • Jenna Tauber

    (Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, New York, NY 11432, USA)

  • Anvit Rai

    (Stony Brook School of Medicine, New York, NY 11794, USA)

  • Cassandra Thiel

    (Departments of Population Health and Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA)

  • Tiana J. Geringer

    (Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA)

  • Umar K. Mian

    (Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA)

Abstract

(1) Background: Healthcare is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially within the surgical suite. Ophthalmologists play a role, since they frequently perform high-volume procedures, such as cataract surgery. This review aims to summarize the current literature on surgical waste and GHG emissions in ophthalmology and proposes a framework to standardize future studies. (2) Methods: Protocol and reporting methods were based on PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. Articles that reported any quantitative measurement of waste or GHGs produced from ophthalmic surgeries were eligible for inclusion. Commentaries, opinion papers, reviews and articles in a non-English language were excluded. (3) Results: A total of 713 articles were reviewed, with 10 articles found to meet inclusion criteria. Six studies produced level 3 evidence, two level 4 evidence, and one level 5 evidence. According to studies, most of the GHGs came from procurement of surgical materials, followed by travel emissions and building energy. (4) Conclusions: Research on waste and GHGs produced in ophthalmic surgery is limited, and existing studies utilize varied approaches to quantify this waste. We propose a standardized waste-lifecycle framework for researchers to organize future research. Such standardization will help in comparing studies and may uncover more opportunities to implement impactful waste reduction strategies in ophthalmology.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Morris & Jenna Tauber & Anvit Rai & Cassandra Thiel & Tiana J. Geringer & Umar K. Mian, 2024. "Waste and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Produced from Ophthalmic Surgeries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2024:i:1:p:51-:d:1558117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/1/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/1/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2024:i:1:p:51-:d:1558117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.