IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2024i1p47-d1557975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool and a Universal Low-Cost Robotized Microscope for the Automated Diagnosis of Malaria

Author

Listed:
  • Carles Rubio Maturana

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
    Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Allisson Dantas de Oliveira

    (Computational Biology and Complex Systems Group, Physics Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08860 Castelldefels, Spain)

  • Francesc Zarzuela

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Alejandro Mediavilla

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
    Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Patricia Martínez-Vallejo

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
    Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Aroa Silgado

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
    Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain
    Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Lidia Goterris

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
    Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Marc Muixí

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Alberto Abelló

    (Database Technologies and Information Management Group, Service and Information Systems Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Anna Veiga

    (Probitas Foundation, 08022 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Daniel López-Codina

    (Computational Biology and Complex Systems Group, Physics Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08860 Castelldefels, Spain)

  • Elena Sulleiro

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain
    Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain
    Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Elisa Sayrol

    (Tecnocampus, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08302 Mataró, Spain)

  • Joan Joseph-Munné

    (Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The gold standard diagnosis for malaria is the microscopic visualization of blood smears to identify Plasmodium parasites, although it is an expert-dependent technique and could trigger diagnostic errors. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on digital image analysis were postulated as a suitable supportive alternative for automated malaria diagnosis. A diagnostic evaluation of the iMAGING AI-based system was conducted in the reference laboratory of the International Health Unit Drassanes-Vall d’Hebron in Barcelona, Spain. iMAGING is an automated device for the diagnosis of malaria by using artificial intelligence image analysis tools and a robotized microscope. A total of 54 Giemsa-stained thick blood smear samples from travelers and migrants coming from endemic areas were employed and analyzed to determine the presence/absence of Plasmodium parasites. AI diagnostic results were compared with expert light microscopy gold standard method results. The AI system shows 81.25% sensitivity and 92.11% specificity when compared with the conventional light microscopy gold standard method. Overall, 48/54 (88.89%) samples were correctly identified [13/16 (81.25%) as positives and 35/38 (92.11%) as negatives]. The mean time of the AI system to determine a positive malaria diagnosis was 3 min and 48 s, with an average of 7.38 FoV analyzed per sample. Statistical analyses showed the Kappa Index = 0.721, demonstrating a satisfactory correlation between the gold standard diagnostic method and iMAGING results. The AI system demonstrated reliable results for malaria diagnosis in a reference laboratory in Barcelona. Validation in malaria-endemic regions will be the next step to evaluate its potential in resource-poor settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Carles Rubio Maturana & Allisson Dantas de Oliveira & Francesc Zarzuela & Alejandro Mediavilla & Patricia Martínez-Vallejo & Aroa Silgado & Lidia Goterris & Marc Muixí & Alberto Abelló & Anna Veiga & , 2024. "Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool and a Universal Low-Cost Robotized Microscope for the Automated Diagnosis of Malaria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2024:i:1:p:47-:d:1557975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/1/47/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/1/47/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2024:i:1:p:47-:d:1557975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.