IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1207-d1477406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Psychological Control and Risk-Taking among Taiwanese Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Benefit Perception as a Mediator

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine P. Chou

    (Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

Youth risk-taking behaviors present important public health concerns due to their prevalence and potential adverse consequences, underscoring the need for research and prevention strategies to promote youth’s healthy development. The present research examined the relationship between parental psychological control and risk-taking behaviors via benefit perception among high school and college students in Taiwan. Using a cross-sectional design, the study surveyed 378 participants to assess maternal and paternal psychological control, benefit perception, and engagement in risk-taking behaviors. Results indicated no significant difference in psychological control or benefit perception between high school and college students. However, college students reported higher levels of risk-taking behaviors, such as risky driving, alcohol use, and unprotected sex. Both maternal and paternal psychological control positively correlated with benefit perception and risk-taking behaviors. Furthermore, benefit perception mediated the relationship between psychological control and risk-taking behavior among high school and college students. These findings suggested that parental psychological control indirectly influenced youth risk-taking by shaping their perceptions of the benefits of such behaviors. The study highlights the importance of promoting autonomy-supportive parenting to reduce risk-taking behaviors and advocates for programs that enhance decision-making skills among adolescents and emerging adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine P. Chou, 2024. "Parental Psychological Control and Risk-Taking among Taiwanese Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Benefit Perception as a Mediator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1207-:d:1477406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma Soane & Chris Dewberry & Sunitha Narendran, 2010. "The role of perceived costs and perceived benefits in the relationship between personality and risk-related choices," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 303-318, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Ye & Yangbin Liu & Jiwei Wang & Ming Wang & Peijun Shi, 2017. "Farmers’ crop insurance perception and participation decisions: empirical evidence from Hunan, China," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 664-677, May.
    2. Yogita Singh & Mohd. Adil & S. M. Imamul Haque, 2023. "Personality traits and behaviour biases: the moderating role of risk-tolerance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3549-3573, August.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:112-134 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Canina, Linda & Carvell, Steven A. & Ma, Qingzhong & Ukhov, Andrey D., 2013. "Business cycle and asset valuation in the gaming industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1689-1695.
    5. Sophie A. Rocks & Iljana Schubert & Emma Soane & Edgar Black & Rachel Muckle & Judith Petts & George Prpich & Simon J. Pollard, 2017. "Engaging with Comparative Risk Appraisals: Public Views on Policy Priorities for Environmental Risk Governance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(9), pages 1683-1692, September.
    6. Di Wang & Frank McGroarty, 2022. "Does perfectionism influence individual financial risk tolerance and financial well-being? Evidence from an online survey data from the US," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-32, November.
    7. Rupali Misra & Sumita Srivastava & D. K. Banwet, 2019. "Are type B investors efficacious? Exploring role of personality in ambidextrous investment decision-making," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 27-34, March.
    8. Hideo Suzuki & Masaya Misaki & Frank Krueger & Jerzy Bodurka, 2015. "Neural Responses to Truth Telling and Risk Propensity under Asymmetric Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Dung Phuong Hoang and Thong Huy Vu, 2020. "Debit Card Usage as a Rational Choice: The Moderating Effect of Cash Habit," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 159-183, March.
    10. Blaufus, Kay & Zinowsky, Tim, 2013. "Investigating the determinants of experts' tax aggressiveness: Experience and personality traits," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 151, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    11. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Vrajlal Sapovadia & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "Role of Gender in Predicting Determinant of Financial Risk Tolerance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Yiyun Shou & Joel Olney, 2020. "Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(1), pages 112-134, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1207-:d:1477406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.