IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1201-d1475419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting Women after Obstetric Fistula Surgery to Enhance Their Social Participation and Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Tibeb Debele

    (Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, 31 George St., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
    Department of Clinical Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar 196, Ethiopia)

  • Heather M. Aldersey

    (Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, 31 George St., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Danielle Macdonald

    (School of Nursing, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Zelalem Mengistu

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali 6955, Rwanda)

  • Dawit Gebeyehu Mekonnen

    (Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, 31 George St., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
    Department of Clinical Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar 196, Ethiopia)

  • Beata Batorowicz

    (Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, 31 George St., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

Abstract

Obstetric fistula is a childbirth complication causing abnormal openings between the urinary, bowel, and genital tracts, leading to involuntary leakage and potential long-term disability. Even after surgical repair, women continue to face psychological and social challenges that affect their social inclusion and participation. This study explored family and service provider perspectives on current support systems and identified gaps affecting women’s inclusion and participation post-fistula surgery. Building on a prior study of women who underwent obstetric fistula surgical repair, we qualitatively examined available formal and informal post-surgical supports in Ethiopia. We conducted 20 interviews with family members and service providers and analyzed them using Charmaz’s grounded theory inductive analysis approach. We identified four themes that indicated the available formal support in fistula care, the impact of formal support on women’s social participation and inclusion, the gaps in formal support systems, and post-surgery informal supports and their challenges. Both groups believed support needs for women after surgery remain unmet, highlighting the need to strengthen holistic support services to improve women’s social inclusion and participation. This study contributes to limited research on formal and informal support for women, emphasizing the need for enhanced economic, psychological, and sexual health-related support post-obstetric fistula surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Tibeb Debele & Heather M. Aldersey & Danielle Macdonald & Zelalem Mengistu & Dawit Gebeyehu Mekonnen & Beata Batorowicz, 2024. "Supporting Women after Obstetric Fistula Surgery to Enhance Their Social Participation and Inclusion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1201-:d:1475419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne M. Khisa, 2015. "An Exploratory Study of Reintegration of Women Following Obstetric Fistula Surgery in West Pokot, Kenya," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1201-:d:1475419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.