IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1193-d1474527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Physical Activity on Memory Loss and Concentration in Adults Aged 18 or Older in the U.S. in 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Serena C. L. Buchwald

    (Department of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Daniel Gitelman

    (Department of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dins Smits

    (Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

  • Pura E. Rodriguez de la Vega

    (Department of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Noël C. Barengo

    (Department of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    School of Medicine, National University of Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina)

Abstract

This cross-sectional study used secondary data from the USA 2020 National Health Interview Survey database. The goal of this study is to outline the impact physical activity has on cognition and mental ability. The reason we chose to pursue this research was a result of the exponentially growing weight of economic and emotional burden caused by cognitive impairments and diseases. The main outcome was whether individuals experienced dementia symptoms such as memory loss and difficulty concentrating. The main exposure was following physical activity guidelines (none, strength only, aerobic only, both). The confounders included age, sex, region, heart disease status, smoking status, drinking status, and depression status. The sample is composed of 30,119 USA adults aged 18 or older. Of those participants, 46% were male and 54% were female. By age, 96% were 18–84 years old, and approximately 4% were 85 and older. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). There was a statistically significant association between difficulty following physical activity guidelines and cognitive difficulties. Those who met aerobic only increased the odds of cognitive difficulty by 52% (OR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.34–1.74) compared with those who met both criteria. Those who met the strength criteria had 1.7 greater odds of cognitive difficulties (OR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.42–2.02) than those who met both criteria. Those who met neither of these guidelines had almost threefold greater odds of having cognitive difficulties (OR 2.64; 95% CI: 2.36–2.96) than those who met both guidelines. Researchers and healthcare providers should collaborate to encourage meeting these guidelines and addressing barriers preventing people from being physically active, such as physical limitations and access to safe recreational spaces. Future studies should address the health disparities regarding physical activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Serena C. L. Buchwald & Daniel Gitelman & Dins Smits & Pura E. Rodriguez de la Vega & Noël C. Barengo, 2024. "The Impact of Physical Activity on Memory Loss and Concentration in Adults Aged 18 or Older in the U.S. in 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1193-:d:1474527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Codella & Andrea Chirico, 2023. "Physical Inactivity and Depression: The Gloomy Dual with Rising Costs in a Large-Scale Emergency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-5, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1193-:d:1474527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.