IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1192-d1474288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of an Australian First Nations Primary Healthcare Data Specification with Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations

Author

Listed:
  • Boyd Potts

    (Cluster for Resilience and Wellbeing, Appleton and Manna Institutes, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD 4701, Australia)

  • Christopher M. Doran

    (Cluster for Resilience and Wellbeing, Appleton and Manna Institutes, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD 4701, Australia)

  • Stephen J. Begg

    (Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia)

Abstract

Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations (PPH) is a widely used indicator of the effectiveness of non-hospital care. Specified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding, PPH comprises a suite of health conditions that could have potentially been prevented with appropriate care. The most recent edition of the National Guide to a Preventative Health Assessment for First Nations People documents the health conditions of interest to providers of primary care, many of which are not represented in PPH. Given the National Guide has been developed specifically with First Nations in mind, the aim of this research is twofold. The first aim is to formally posit the question of whether a summative measure of hospitalisations aligned diagnostically to the National Guide has value either as an alternative or complement to PPH in the context of First Nations primary health information. The second aim is to develop and present a prototype ICD-10 data specification for such a measure, referred to as the First Nations primary healthcare (FNPHC) data specification, and examine the age-standardised hospitalisation rates for FNPHC and PPH for correlations and/or differences. Age-standardised hospitalisation rates from 2016–17 to 2019–20 using both classifications were examined to assess the usefulness and relevance of summative measures of hospitalisations for informing primary care. Rates of FNPHC for principal diagnoses were between 1.5 and 2.5 times higher than those of PPH and approximately between 6 and 12 times higher for additional diagnoses. There was a strong correlation with PPH when rates were compared across all observations: jurisdictions with higher rates of PPH tended to have higher rates of hospitalisations according to the custom specification. Findings support its application as a summary measure for First Nations primary care providers. Given the policy landscape in Australia that aims to close the gap, it is imperative that measures of primary health take advantage of the concepts and application of First Nations data sovereignty and governance. The validity and cultural appropriateness of the First Nations primary health data specification needs to be further researched.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyd Potts & Christopher M. Doran & Stephen J. Begg, 2024. "A Comparison of an Australian First Nations Primary Healthcare Data Specification with Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1192-:d:1474288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyd Potts & Christopher M. Doran & Stephen Begg, 2024. "The Utility of Data Collected as Part of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1192-:d:1474288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.