Author
Listed:
- Man Hung
(College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA
Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
College of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)
- Jeremy D. Franklin
(University of Utah Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA)
- William A. Smith
(College of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Huntsman Mental Health Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)
- Carlos J. Crespo
(College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA)
- Evelyn U. Ezikwelu
(College of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)
- Jerry Bounsanga
(College of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)
- Martin S. Lipsky
(College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA
Institute on Aging, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA)
Abstract
Background: This study explored whether opinions about the government’s role in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic vary based on demographic characteristics and racial beliefs. We hypothesized that opinions about the United States (U.S.) government’s response to COVID-19 would differ based on an individual’s characteristics such as age, race, and racial beliefs. Methods: We utilized an Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research dataset to examine differences in opinion regarding the government’s pandemic response, considering personal characteristics and racial beliefs. Descriptive statistics depicted respondents’ characteristics, and a Chi-square test for independence assessed whether differences emerged based on racial attitude, self-reported racial identity, sex, income, education, and age. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to independently determine which characteristics were associated with differences in evaluating the government’s pandemic response. Results: The sample consisted of 1028 respondents: 47.5% male and 52.5% female. Overall, the group viewed the government unfavorably, with only 40% reporting that the government responded correctly and 54% believing the government is almost always wasteful and inefficient. Hispanics or Latinos were more likely to view the government as wasteful or inefficient, while more Whites rated the government’s pandemic response as appropriate. Individuals who believed that racial discrimination is the main reason why many Black people cannot get ahead generally regarded the government’s pandemic response more favorably. Only 5% deemed the government’s response excessive. Being Black, younger, and female was associated with the view that racial discrimination is the main reason why many Black people cannot get ahead. Individuals who felt this way viewed the government unfavorably by almost a 2:1 ratio. Conclusions: A majority of U.S. residents do not believe the government responded correctly to the pandemic and more than half viewed the government as wasteful and inefficient. Differences emerged by ethnicity and racial attitudes, with individuals of color holding more negative views of the government’s response. Understanding this perspective can help develop messaging and strategies that resonate with communities where racial and minority groups live.
Suggested Citation
Man Hung & Jeremy D. Franklin & William A. Smith & Carlos J. Crespo & Evelyn U. Ezikwelu & Jerry Bounsanga & Martin S. Lipsky, 2024.
"Racial Attitudes and Perceptions of Government Response during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Public Health Strategies,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-12, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1183-:d:1471935
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Krantz, M.J. & Coronel, S.M. & Whitley, E.M. & Dale, R. & Yost, J. & Estacio, R.O., 2013.
"Effectiveness of a community health worker cardiovascular risk reduction program in public health and health care settings,"
American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 19-27.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1183-:d:1471935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.