IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i7p958-d1440187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovering from COVID-19 (ReCOV): Feasibility of an Allied-Health-Led Multidisciplinary Outpatient Rehabilitation Service for People with Long COVID

Author

Listed:
  • Aruska N. D’Souza

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia)

  • Myvanwy Merrett

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia)

  • Hilda Griffin

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia)

  • An Tran-Duy

    (Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
    Methods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health Research (MISCH) Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Carly Struck

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia)

  • Timothy N. Fazio

    (Health Intelligence Unit, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia
    Electronic Medical Records, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia
    Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkvillle, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Genevieve Juj

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia)

  • Catherine L. Granger

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Casey L. Peiris

    (Allied Health, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkvillle, VIC 3050, Australia
    School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Background: A multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of long COVID. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility (demand, implementation, practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy) of an allied-health-led multidisciplinary symptom management service (ReCOV) for long COVID. Methods: A single-group observational cohort feasibility study was conducted to determine demand (referrals), acceptability (survey), implementation (waitlist times, health professions seen), practicality (adverse events), and limited efficacy (admission and discharge scores from the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Patient Health Questionnaire, and EuroQol 5D-5L). Data are presented as median [interquartile range] or count (percentage). Results: During the study, 143 participants (aged 42.00 [32.00–51.00] years, 68% women) participated in ReCOV. Participants were waitlisted for 3.86 [2.14–9.86] weeks and engaged with 5.00 [3.00–6.00] different health professionals. No adverse events occurred. The thematic analysis revealed that ReCOV was helpful but did not fully meet the needs of all participants. Limited efficacy testing indicated that participants had improved understanding and control ( p < 0.001) of symptoms (BIPQ) and a small improvement in EQ VAS score (median difference 5.50 points [0.00–25.00], p = 0.004]). Conclusions: A multidisciplinary service was safe and mostly acceptable to participants for the management of long COVID. Further research should investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of such a service, including optimal service duration and patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Aruska N. D’Souza & Myvanwy Merrett & Hilda Griffin & An Tran-Duy & Carly Struck & Timothy N. Fazio & Genevieve Juj & Catherine L. Granger & Casey L. Peiris, 2024. "Recovering from COVID-19 (ReCOV): Feasibility of an Allied-Health-Led Multidisciplinary Outpatient Rehabilitation Service for People with Long COVID," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:958-:d:1440187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/958/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/958/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:958-:d:1440187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.