IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i7p881-d1430040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treating Mental Health and Quality of Life in Older Cancer Patients with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn O’Keefe

    (College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • Meiyan Chen

    (School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Kevin J. Lesser

    (College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • Adam S. DuVall

    (Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

  • Alexander T. Dils

    (College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been successfully utilized in improving mental health (MH) and quality of life (QoL) in the general population, regardless of age. Cancer, which is most frequently diagnosed in older adults, is a debilitating illness that has a detrimental and long-lasting effect on patients’ MH and QoL. While numerous studies have demonstrated CBT’s efficacy, little evidence exists for its role in older cancer patients. This study, using MH and QoL metrics, evaluates the effectiveness of CBT for older adult cancer patients. Methods: Focusing on MH and QoL and an average age of over 60 years old, a final analysis was performed on 17 clinical trials with a total of 124 effect sizes, including 3073 participants receiving CBT. “Metaphor” and “Robumeta” packages in R Statistical Software (version 4.2.2) were used for analysis, which included robust variance estimation (RVE) in intercept-only meta-regression, and univariate meta-regression for moderator analysis. Results: With 17 clinical trials and 124 effect sizes, our results show that CBT moderately improves MH and QoL in cancer patients d = 0.19, 95% CI 0.0166–0.364, p < 0.0399. The delivery format was shown to be a strong moderator of CBT effectiveness with interpersonal technological interventions combined with pre-programmed segments having a very strong treatment effect size (d = 1.7307, 95% CI 1.5244–1.937, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of CBT in older adult cancer patients statistically improves MH and QoL, with delivery format and stages of treatment having important roles. Tech-only interpersonal interventions combined with pre-programmed CBT provide an avenue for targeting older adult cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn O’Keefe & Meiyan Chen & Kevin J. Lesser & Adam S. DuVall & Alexander T. Dils, 2024. "Treating Mental Health and Quality of Life in Older Cancer Patients with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:881-:d:1430040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongfeng Zhang & Peng Cheng & Lu Huang, 2023. "The Impact of the Medical Insurance System on the Health of Older Adults in Urban China: Analysis Based on Three-Period Panel Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Tumosa, 2023. "Using the Age-Friendly Health Systems Framework to Track Wellness and Health Promotion Priorities of Older Adults in the Global Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-5, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:881-:d:1430040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.