IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i6p721-d1406820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Users’ Perceptions of Access to and Quality of Unified Health System Services in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study and Implications to Healthcare Management Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Jhoyce S. Souza

    (Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Aluízio da Silva Gomes 50—Granja dos Cavaleiros, Macaé 27930-560, RJ, Brazil)

  • Edna A. Reis

    (Department of Statistics, Exact Sciences Institute, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Campus Pampulha, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil)

  • Brian Godman

    (Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
    Department of Public Health and Pharmacy Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria 0208, South Africa)

  • Stephen M. Campbell

    (Department of Public Health and Pharmacy Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria 0208, South Africa
    School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Johanna C. Meyer

    (Department of Public Health and Pharmacy Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria 0208, South Africa)

  • Luann W. P. Sena

    (College of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biological Studies, Federal University of South and Southeast of Pará, Avenida dos Ipês, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Loteamento Cidade Jardim, Marabá 68508-970, PA, Brazil)

  • Isabella P. D. Godói

    (Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Aluízio da Silva Gomes 50—Granja dos Cavaleiros, Macaé 27930-560, RJ, Brazil
    Health Technology Assessment Center—Management, Economics, Health Education and Pharmaceutical Services (GEESFAR/NATS/UFRJ), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Aluízio da Silva Gomes 50—Granja dos Cavaleiros, Macaé 27930-560, RJ, Brazil)

Abstract

Evaluating the access to and quality of healthcare services from the users’ perspective is an important assessment process to identify priorities. This study assessed the profile of health service usage and the views of the Unified Health System (SUS) users about the access to and quality of SUS public health services. A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants from the Coastal Lowlands Region of the Rio de Janeiro State/Brazil, between August and November 2023. The association between categorical variables was analyzed using the Pearson Chi-Square test, using R software 4.3. A total of 200 individuals were interviewed using a 66-question survey instrument. Participants who reported using SUS services more frequently rated this system as essential ( p -value = 0.031). However, overall, 64% of participants rated the quality of care to be very bad/bad and 34.9% rated access as very bad/bad. Access was considered poor by respondents who used public services rarely or sometimes ( p -value = 0.002). In terms of accessing SUS services consultations provided by specialists (e.g., neurologists), these were available only in another municipality ( p -value = 0.001). Many participants were SUS dependent for health services, and gaps and weaknesses were observed regarding users‘ perspectives of the access to and quality of SUS health care. Policymakers should prioritize evaluations and dialogue with the community to make SUS services responsive and to optimize value-for-money in health service planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhoyce S. Souza & Edna A. Reis & Brian Godman & Stephen M. Campbell & Johanna C. Meyer & Luann W. P. Sena & Isabella P. D. Godói, 2024. "Users’ Perceptions of Access to and Quality of Unified Health System Services in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study and Implications to Healthcare Management Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:721-:d:1406820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/721/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/721/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:721-:d:1406820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.