IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i6p671-d1401031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Feasibility of an Electronic Tool for Predicting Retention in HIV Care: Provider Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Kromash

    (Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, 924 E. 57th Street, Suite 104, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

  • Eleanor E. Friedman

    (Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 5065, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

  • Samantha A. Devlin

    (Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 5065, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

  • Jessica Schmitt

    (Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 5065, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

  • John M. Flores

    (Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 5065, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

  • Jessica P. Ridgway

    (Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 5065, Chicago, IL 60637, USA)

Abstract

Retention in care for people living with HIV (PLWH) is important for individual and population health. Preemptive identification of PLWH at high risk of lapsing in care may improve retention efforts. We surveyed providers at nine institutions throughout Chicago about their perspectives on using an electronic health record (EHR) tool to predict the risk of lapsing in care. Sixty-three percent (20/32) of providers reported currently assessing patients’ risk for lapsing in care, and 91% (29/32) reported willingness to implement an EHR tool. When compared to those with other job roles, prescribers agreed (vs. neutral) that the tool would be less biased than personal judgment (OR 13.33, 95% CI 1.05, 169.56). Prescribers were also more likely to identify community health workers as persons who should deliver these interventions (OR 10.50, 95% CI 1.02, 108.58). Transportation, housing, substance use, and employment information were factors that providers wanted to be included in an EHR-based tool. Social workers were significantly more likely to indicate the inclusion of employment information as important (OR 10.50, 95% CI 1.11, 98.87) when compared to other participants. Acceptability of an EHR tool was high; future research should investigate barriers and evaluate the effectiveness of such a tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Kromash & Eleanor E. Friedman & Samantha A. Devlin & Jessica Schmitt & John M. Flores & Jessica P. Ridgway, 2024. "Exploring the Feasibility of an Electronic Tool for Predicting Retention in HIV Care: Provider Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:671-:d:1401031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:671-:d:1401031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.