IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i5p616-d1393695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair Funding Decisions: Consistency of the Time Horizons Used in the Calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years for Therapies for Very Rare Diseases by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmin Barman-Aksözen

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Nicole Hentschel

    (Independent Researcher, Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Mårten Pettersson

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Eva Schupp

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Francesca Granata

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
    Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, S.C Medicina ad Indirizzo Metabolico, 20122 Milano, Italy)

  • Cornelia Dechant

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Mehmet Hakan Aksözen

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Rocco Falchetto

    (International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatments. A QALY is a measure that combines the size of the clinical benefit of a treatment with the time the patient benefits from it, i.e., the time horizon. We wanted to know how consistently QALY gains are calculated at NICE. Therefore, we have analysed information on the time horizons used for the QALY calculations of the concluded evaluations conducted under the Highly Specialised Technologies programme for treatments of very rare diseases at NICE. For treatments with final guidance published by December 2023 ( n = 29), a time horizon of median 97.5 years (range: 35 to 125 years) was used to calculate the QALY gains. For most QALY calculations, the accepted time horizon was longer than either the expected treatment duration or the estimated life expectancy. In contrast, for the only technology with a final negative funding decision, i.e., afamelanotide for treating the lifelong chronic disease erythropoietic protoporphyria, a time horizon that was shorter than the expected treatment duration was used. The fairness and consistency of the evaluation process of treatments for very rare diseases at NICE should be reviewed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmin Barman-Aksözen & Nicole Hentschel & Mårten Pettersson & Eva Schupp & Francesca Granata & Cornelia Dechant & Mehmet Hakan Aksözen & Rocco Falchetto, 2024. "Fair Funding Decisions: Consistency of the Time Horizons Used in the Calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years for Therapies for Very Rare Diseases by the National Institute for Health and Care Excel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:5:p:616-:d:1393695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/5/616/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/5/616/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasmin Barman-Aksözen & Anna-Elisabeth Minder & Francesca Granata & Mårten Pettersson & Cornelia Dechant & Mehmet Hakan Aksözen & Rocco Falchetto, 2023. "Quality-Adjusted Life Years in Erythropoietic Protoporphyria and Other Rare Diseases: A Patient-Initiated EQ-5D Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:5:p:616-:d:1393695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.