IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i2p122-d1324902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of Care in Providing Comprehensive Healthcare on Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review with a TIDieR Checklist Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Torreggiani

    (Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Deborah Maselli

    (International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, 41125 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Stefania Costi

    (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Monica Guberti

    (Research and EBP Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The study’s aim is to identify the models of care used to provide survivorship care plans (SCPs) to cancer survivors in healthcare services, describing what kind of professionals are involved, in which settings and timings, and their feasibility. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews is followed. Studies that considered the SCPs applying different models of care, in any healthcare setting on any adult cancer survivors who completed oncological treatments, have been included. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Cinahal were searched from 2013 to 2023 with these keywords: “Survivorship Care Plan”, “Oncology”, and “Program”. The study selection process was reported with the PRISMA-ScR. A total of 325 records were identified, 42 were screened, and, ultimately, 23 articles were included. Results: The models of care include: SCP standardization in hospitals; self-support oriented; consultation-based; primary or specialist direct referral; shared care; a multimodal approach. Multidisciplinary teams were involved in the SCP models of care. The settings were private clinics or cancer centers. One-hour SCP interventions were most frequently delivered through in-person visits, by telephone, or online. Conclusions: Implementing SCPs is feasible in healthcare contexts, but with challenges, like time and resource management. Patient-centered programs promoting coordinated care are promising models of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Torreggiani & Deborah Maselli & Stefania Costi & Monica Guberti, 2024. "Models of Care in Providing Comprehensive Healthcare on Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review with a TIDieR Checklist Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:122-:d:1324902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leslie W. Ross & Julie S. Townsend & Elizabeth A. Rohan, 2022. "Still Lost in Transition? Perspectives of Ongoing Cancer Survivorship Care Needs from Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs, Survivors, and Health Care Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Maria Noonan & Julie Jomeen & Owen Doody, 2021. "A Review of the Involvement of Partners and Family Members in Psychosocial Interventions for Supporting Women at Risk of or Experiencing Perinatal Depression and Anxiety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grażyna Iwanowicz-Palus & Mariola Mróz & Aleksandra Korda & Agnieszka Marcewicz & Agnieszka Palus, 2022. "Perinatal Anxiety among Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Brian J. Carter & Tzuan A. Chen & Dalnim Cho & Shahnjayla K. Connors & Ammar D. Siddiqi & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Examining Associations between Source of Cancer Information and Mammography Behavior among Black Church-Going Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:122-:d:1324902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.