IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i12p1704-d1549147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universal Safety Planning for Suicide Prevention: CODE RED Initial Feasibility and Acceptability

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Cerel

    (College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Martina Fruhbauerova

    (Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Alice Edwards

    (College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Leah Murphy

    (College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Elizabeth Salt

    (College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Beck Whipple

    (Kentucky Department for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities, Frankfort, KY 40621, USA)

  • Patti M. Clark

    (Kentucky Department for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities, Frankfort, KY 40621, USA)

  • John Ackerman

    (Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA)

Abstract

Suicide rates have increased in the US over the last decades. Schools often deliver suicide prevention trainings and there is growing evidence that these trainings in schools are effective. The current study examined a new upstream approach, CODE RED in which trainees complete their own safety plan prior to a mental health emergency. Participants were adult school personnel ( n = 201) who completed CODE RED trainings and were surveyed using three validated 4-item measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM), intervention appropriateness measure (IAM), and feasibility of intervention measure (FIM). Open-ended questions were analyzed using a thematic approach. Of 201 participants who completed the survey, acceptability (18.0), appropriateness (17.9) and feasibility (18.0) were high as assessed by standardized implementation measures (each out of 20). Open-ended responses further indicated a great deal of satisfaction with the training. As a first step in determining acceptability and feasibility, CODE RED was found to be highly acceptable to adult school employees who found it applicable, appealing as an intervention, and easy to use. Most staff are hopeful that it will be useful with youth as well. It will be important to determine how this activity is used by youth and if it can be used in mental health crises to decrease symptoms.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Cerel & Martina Fruhbauerova & Alice Edwards & Leah Murphy & Elizabeth Salt & Beck Whipple & Patti M. Clark & John Ackerman, 2024. "Universal Safety Planning for Suicide Prevention: CODE RED Initial Feasibility and Acceptability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1704-:d:1549147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1704-:d:1549147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.