IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i12p1659-d1541938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and Facilitators for the Use of Patient Lifts by Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ghassan M. Khairallah

    (Employee Health Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Beirut P.O. Box 11-0236, Lebanon)

  • Hani Mowafi

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Yale University, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06501, USA)

  • Samar Al-Hajj

    (Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Beirut P.O. Box 11-0236, Lebanon)

  • Alexandria Brackett

    (Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, New Haven, CT 06501, USA)

  • Carine J. Sakr

    (Employee Health Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Beirut P.O. Box 11-0236, Lebanon)

Abstract

(1) Background: Patient lifts are evidence-based engineering controls used in Safe Patient Handling Programs to assist healthcare workers in moving patients. They have been shown to be beneficial for both healthcare workers and patients. However, these devices are not consistently used. This review aims to determine the scope of the literature and examine the barriers and facilitators for the use of patient lifts by healthcare workers, on a global level. (2) Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science—Core Collection, Cochrane CENTRAL, Trials Register of Promoting Health Interventions, PAIS Index (Proquest), and the gray literature were reviewed. Duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were screened, full texts were assessed, and the quality of the studies were checked. The analysis was carried out qualitatively using thematic analysis. (3) Results: A total of 57 articles were included in this review. Most studies (71.9%) originated in the US alone, and none originated in low- and middle-income countries. The majority were quantitative studies and were conducted in acute care hospitals. The main identified barriers were equipment-related (e.g., time constraints, device unavailability, and inconvenient storage), followed by cultural and behavioral factors (peer pressure, resistance to change, and occupational socialization), followed by organizational factors (staff shortage and workload). The main identified facilitators were mostly organizational factors (leadership support, minimal lift policy, standardized protocols), followed by cultural and behavioral factors (safety culture and worker’s empowerment), then equipment-related factors (device availability and accessibility). Patient- and worker-related factors were the least mentioned. (4) Conclusion: There is a complex interplay of organizational, equipment-related, and cultural factors shaping the use of lifts by healthcare workers. A multifaceted approach that focuses on enhancing organizational support, fostering a robust safety culture, and ensuring equipment availability is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghassan M. Khairallah & Hani Mowafi & Samar Al-Hajj & Alexandria Brackett & Carine J. Sakr, 2024. "Barriers and Facilitators for the Use of Patient Lifts by Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1659-:d:1541938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1659-:d:1541938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.