IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i12p1633-d1539100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential for Lifestyle Intervention Among Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour Based on Patient Needs Including Smoking and Other Risky Lifestyle Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Line Noes Lydom

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

  • Susanne Vahr Lauridsen

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
    Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Ulla Nordström Joensen

    (Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
    Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Hanne Tønnesen

    (WHO-CC/Clinical Health Promotion Centre, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

Abstract

Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer worldwide, with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounting for 75% of cases. Transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURBT) is the standard treatment, but it is associated with significant risks of complications and recurrence. Risky lifestyle factors, including smoking, malnutrition, obesity, risky alcohol use, and physical inactivity (collectively termed SNAP factors), may worsen surgical outcomes and increase cancer recurrence. Prehabilitation programmes targeting these modifiable risk factors could improve patient outcomes. This cross-sectional study assessed 100 TURBT patients at a Danish university hospital to determine the prevalence of SNAP factors and the potential for lifestyle interventions. Data were collected via structured interviews, and intervention scenarios were projected based on efficacy rates of 5–100%. In total, 58% of patients had at least one risky SNAP factor, with smoking (29%) being the most prevalent, followed by physical inactivity (19%) and risky alcohol use (18%). Obesity (7%) and malnutrition (8%) were less common. Seventeen percent had multiple SNAP factors. No significant demographic indicators were associated with the presence of SNAP factors. TURBT patients with NMIBC show a high prevalence of risky lifestyle factors, including smoking and obesity, with over half affected. Systematic screening and targeted interventions could significantly improve patient outcomes and long-term health.

Suggested Citation

  • Line Noes Lydom & Susanne Vahr Lauridsen & Ulla Nordström Joensen & Hanne Tønnesen, 2024. "The Potential for Lifestyle Intervention Among Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour Based on Patient Needs Including Smoking and Other Risky Lifestyle Factors: A Cross-Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1633-:d:1539100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1633-:d:1539100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.