IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i12p1582-d1531274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appraising the Factors Associated with Delirium Care Behaviours and Barriers to Their Assessment Among Clinical Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Ka Yee Chow

    (Discipline of Nursing & Healthcare, Hong Kong Nang Yan College of Higher Education, Hong Kong SAR, China
    Faculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao SAR, China)

  • Soi Chu Chan

    (Kiang Wu Hospital, Macao SAR, China)

Abstract

Delirium can occur at any age, although the incidence is higher in older patients and after surgery. Although delirium is an acute, potentially reversible, cognitive disorder, there is evidence that it is associated with increased healthcare costs and imposes a significant burden on patients, families, hospitals, and public resources. The aim of this study was to investigate and assess the knowledge, behaviours, and factors influencing assessments of delirium by hospital nurses so as to predict the factors associated with their current delirium management behaviours. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 342 nurses in different hospitals in Macau. The questionnaires included items on the respondents’ demographic information, knowledge of delirium care, nursing behaviours, and factors influencing nurses’ assessment of delirium patients in their daily practice. The descriptive statistics showed that nurses were found to have a moderate level of knowledge about the management of delirium. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed that patient factors were the most significant, outweighing individual and organizational factors as barriers to assessing patients with delirium. The Pearson’s correlation showed a moderate positive correlation between delirium care knowledge and delirium care behaviour (r = 0.339). With regard to factors influencing delirium care behaviours, multiple linear regression models showed that the significant predictors were years of work experience (β = 0.206, 95% CI: 1.125–3.158), the duration of delirium care courses (β = 0.103, 95% CI: 0.118–3.339), the knowledge of delirium care (β = 0.264, 95% CI: 0.474–1.019), and personal factors influencing nurses’ delirium assessments (β = −0.239, 95% CI: −1.031–−0.432). To enhance delirium management and achieve the optimal care of patients with delirium, formal education and training are crucial. Organizations should develop structured protocols and workflows that empower nurses. By integrating organizational strategies with individual efforts, clinical practices can be improved, resulting in optimal delirium care for patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Ka Yee Chow & Soi Chu Chan, 2024. "Appraising the Factors Associated with Delirium Care Behaviours and Barriers to Their Assessment Among Clinical Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1582-:d:1531274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1582/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1582/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joaquim Cerejeira & Elizabeta B. Mukaetova-Ladinska, 2011. "A Clinical Update on Delirium: From Early Recognition to Effective Management," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2011, pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed El Hussein & Sandra Hirst, 2016. "Tracking the footsteps: a constructivist grounded theory of the clinical reasoning processes that registered nurses use to recognise delirium," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 381-391, February.
    2. Abeer A Selim & E. Wesley Ely, 2017. "Delirium the under‐recognised syndrome: survey of healthcare professionals’ awareness and practice in the intensive care units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 813-824, March.
    3. Mohamed El Hussein & Sandra Hirst & Joseph Osuji, 2019. "Professional Socialization: A Grounded Theory of the Clinical Reasoning Processes That RNs and LPNs Use to Recognize Delirium," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(3), pages 321-339, March.
    4. Rhonda L Babine & Kristiina E Hyrkäs & Sarah Hallen & Heidi R Wierman & Deborah A Bachand & Joanne L Chapman & Valerie J Fuller, 2018. "Falls and delirium in an acute care setting: A retrospective chart review before and after an organisation‐wide interprofessional education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1429-1441, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1582-:d:1531274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.