IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i12p1572-d1530308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban and Rural Differences in the Efficacy of a Mobile Health Depression Treatment for Young Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Mennis

    (Department of Geography, Environment and Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA)

  • J. Douglas Coatsworth

    (College of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Michael Russell

    (Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Nikola Zaharakis

    (Center for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Aaron R. Brown

    (College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Michael J. Mason

    (Center for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

Abstract

Depression among young adults represents a growing health problem in the U.S., but access to effective treatment remains a challenge. Mobile health (mHealth) approaches promise to deliver accessible and effective depression treatment; however, questions remain regarding how mHealth depression treatment efficacy may vary geographically based on urban and rural environmental contexts. The present study addresses this knowledge gap by leveraging data from a randomized clinical trial of an mHealth depression treatment called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-text (CBT-txt) as applied to a sample of 103 U.S. young adults (ages 18–25). Prior research has demonstrated the efficacy of CBT-txt to reduce depressive symptoms. In the present study, we conduct an exploratory, post hoc analysis employing moderated growth curve modeling to investigate whether observed treatment efficacy differed between study participants residing in rural versus urban areas. The findings indicate that CBT-txt treatment effects in terms of reducing depression symptoms were significantly stronger for young adults residing in rural, as compared to urban, regions (β = 13.759, 95% CI = 0.796, 26.723, p < 0.038). We speculate that this is because of the lack of mental healthcare resources in rural, as compared to urban areas, as well as the greater level of environmental stressors, such as artificial light and noise, found in cities, which may mitigate treatment effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Mennis & J. Douglas Coatsworth & Michael Russell & Nikola Zaharakis & Aaron R. Brown & Michael J. Mason, 2024. "Urban and Rural Differences in the Efficacy of a Mobile Health Depression Treatment for Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1572-:d:1530308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel W. Belsky & Avshalom Caspi & Louise Arseneault & David L. Corcoran & Benjamin W. Domingue & Kathleen Mullan Harris & Renate M. Houts & Jonathan S. Mill & Terrie E. Moffitt & Joseph Prinz & Kare, 2019. "Genetics and the geography of health, behaviour and attainment," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(6), pages 576-586, June.
    2. Ngo, V.K. & Sherbourne, C. & Chung, B. & Tang, L. & Wright, A.L. & Whittington, Y. & Wells, K. & Miranda, J., 2016. "Community engagement compared with technical assistance to disseminate depression care among low-income, minority women: A randomized controlled effectiveness study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(10), pages 1833-1841.
    3. Young-Shin Park & Barbara J. McMorris & Lisiane Pruinelli & Ying Song & Merrie J. Kaas & Jean F. Wyman, 2021. "Use of Geographic Information Systems to Explore Associations between Neighborhood Attributes and Mental Health Outcomes in Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa, Riccardi Maria & Valentina, Pettinicchio & Marcello, Di Pumpo & Gerardo, Altamura & Cesare, Nurchis Mario & Roberta, Markovic & Čedomir, Šagrić & Miodrag, Stojanović & Luca, Rosi & Gianfranco,, 2023. "Community-based participatory research to engage disadvantaged communities: Levels of engagement reached and how to increase it. A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Ojalehto, Elsa & Finkel, Deborah & Russ, Tom C. & Karlsson, Ida K. & Ericsson, Malin, 2023. "Influences of genetically predicted and attained education on geographic mobility and their association with mortality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    3. Gailey, Samantha, 2022. "Moving to greener pastures: Health selection into neighborhood green space among a highly mobile and diverse population in California," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    4. Jaakko Pehkonen & Jutta Viinikainen & Jaana T. Kari & Petri Böckerman & Terho Lehtimäki & Olli Raitakari, 2021. "Birth weight and adult income: An examination of mediation through adult height and body mass," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(10), pages 2383-2398, September.
    5. Jakobsen, Andreas Lindegaard & Lund, Rolf Lyneborg, 2022. "Neighborhood social context and suicide mortality: A multilevel register-based 5-year follow-up study of 2.7 million individuals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1572-:d:1530308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.