IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i12p1570-d1530224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective Coverage of Modern Contraceptive Use in Ethiopia: An Ecological Linking Analysis of Service Provision Assessment and National Health Equity Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Misrak Getnet

    (Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa 1242, Ethiopia
    School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia)

  • Samson Gebremedhin

    (School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia)

  • Dessalegn Y. Melesse

    (Institute for Global Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6, Canada)

  • Melinda K. Munos

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Elizabeth A. Hazel

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Yohannes D. Wado

    (African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi P.O. Box 10787-00100, Kenya)

  • Arega Zeru

    (Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa 1242, Ethiopia)

  • Alemayehu Worku

    (School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia)

Abstract

The increase in contraceptive prevalence rate (crude coverage) in Ethiopia over the past two decades does not necessarily reflect service quality, and although the proportion of women with unmet needs has decreased, it remains unacceptably high. Hence, this study aimed to estimate the effective coverage (EC) of modern contraceptive methods in Ethiopia, considering the quality of care. We used nationally representative surveys, such as health facility surveys (Ethiopia Service Provision Assessment, 2021/22) and household surveys (National Health Equity Survey, 2022/2023). The descriptive analysis and ecological linking of the two surveys were used to assess the relationship between service quality and utilization among married/in union women in need of limiting or spacing children. In 2022, about 78% of health facilities in Ethiopia were ready to provide Family Planning (FP) services using modern contraceptive methods. Met FP need was 48%, with the quality of services assessed at 36%. After accounting for both service quality and readiness, Ethiopia’s effective coverage of family planning services using modern methods was estimated at 16%, with the highest coverage in the Sidama region (21%) and the lowest in the Somali region (2%). The EC of FP services in Ethiopia was low, largely attributed to the poor overall quality of the FP services provided. It is therefore important to ameliorate the quality of FP services in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Misrak Getnet & Samson Gebremedhin & Dessalegn Y. Melesse & Melinda K. Munos & Elizabeth A. Hazel & Yohannes D. Wado & Arega Zeru & Alemayehu Worku, 2024. "Effective Coverage of Modern Contraceptive Use in Ethiopia: An Ecological Linking Analysis of Service Provision Assessment and National Health Equity Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1570-:d:1530224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gili Hrusa & Mark Spigt & Tariku Dejene & Solomon Shiferaw, 2020. "Quality of Family Planning Counseling in Ethiopia: Trends and determinants of information received by female modern contraceptive users, evidence from national survey data, (2014- 2018)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1570-:d:1530224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.