IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i10p1389-d1503543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polypharmacy in Older Patients with Multimorbidity: The Agreement Between Patient and General Practitioner-Reported Drugs Observed in a Pilot cRCT

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Schäfer

    (Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Michael Paulitsch

    (Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Maria Hanf

    (Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Truc Sophia Dinh

    (Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Astrid-Alexandra Klein

    (Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany)

  • Sophia Klasing

    (Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Internal Medicine IX-Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Hanna Seidling

    (Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Internal Medicine IX-Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Karen Voigt

    (Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany)

  • Marjan van den Akker

    (Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

Polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) increases the risk of discrepancies between patient- and general practitioner (GP)-reported drugs, leading to adverse outcomes. This explorative analysis assesses the agreement between patient- and GP-reported drugs under the influence of a paper-based patient portfolio in a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT). Complete data were available for 68 patients aged 65 or older (26 were female), with multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and at least one hospitalization in the past year. Agreement was assessed for drug name and strength level. Differences between the intervention and control group (IG/CG) and comparisons between two time points (six-month interval) stratified according to gender were analyzed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests (α = 5%). To evaluate the reasons for discrepancies, the agreement of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) groups was analyzed. At baseline, the agreement was 72.1% for the IG and 73.9% for the CG. Inclusion of the reported drug strength reduced the agreement in both groups (IG 66.7%, CG 60.0%). Agreement for the IG decreased statistically significantly after six months (−5.4%). ATC groups B, C, and H had the highest agreement, while N, R, and Z had the lowest. Large discrepancies in the drugs reported, due to the APIs and the corresponding ATC group, were observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Schäfer & Michael Paulitsch & Maria Hanf & Truc Sophia Dinh & Astrid-Alexandra Klein & Sophia Klasing & Hanna Seidling & Karen Voigt & Marjan van den Akker, 2024. "Polypharmacy in Older Patients with Multimorbidity: The Agreement Between Patient and General Practitioner-Reported Drugs Observed in a Pilot cRCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1389-:d:1503543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1389-:d:1503543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.