IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i10p1325-d1493502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Blood Flow Restriction on Gait and Mobility in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine L. Hsieh

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Andrew Foster

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Logan MacIntyre

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

  • Reagan Carr

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA)

Abstract

Older adults demonstrate gait impairments that increase their risk for falls. These age-related mobility impairments are in part due to declines in muscle mass and strength. High-intensity exercise can improve muscle strength and mobility but may not be tolerable for older adults due to musculoskeletal injury and pain. Blood flow restriction (BFR) with lower-intensity exercise offers a strategy that may be more tolerable for older adults, but whether BFR improves gait and mobility in older adults is unclear. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of BFR on gait and mobility in healthy older adults. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were systematically searched for articles utilizing BFR in older adults. Articles were included if adults were over 60 years, did not have chronic health conditions, had undergone randomized controlled trials, and presented objectively measured gait outcomes. The search identified 1501 studies, of which 9 were included in the systematic review and 8 studies in the meta-analysis. Outcome measures included the Timed Up and Go (TUG), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 400 m walk test, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and 10 m walk test. Meta-analyses found improvements in the TUG (mean difference (MD) = −0.71; 95% CI = −1.05, −0.37; p < 0.001) and SPPB (MD = −0.94; 95% CI = −1.48, −0.39; p < 0.001) in BFR compared to no BFR. There were no differences in gait speed (MD = 0.59; 95% CI = −0.22, 1.41; p = 0.16). BFR may be effective for gait and mobility tasks over shorter distances. Clinicians may consider incorporating BFR to improve mobility and gait function in older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine L. Hsieh & Andrew Foster & Logan MacIntyre & Reagan Carr, 2024. "Effect of Blood Flow Restriction on Gait and Mobility in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1325-:d:1493502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline de Fátima Ribeiro Silva & Daniela Gonçalves Ohara & Areolino Pena Matos & Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto & Maycon Sousa Pegorari, 2021. "Short Physical Performance Battery as a Measure of Physical Performance and Mortality Predictor in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylwia Mętel & Magdalena Kostrzon & Justyna Adamiak, 2022. "Dynamic Balance and Chest Mobility of Older Adults after Speleotherapy Combined with Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Endurance and Strength Training—A Prospective Study in Chronic Respiratory Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Alejandra Segura Cardona & Doris Cardona Arango & Angela Segura Cardona & Carlos Robledo Marín & Diana Muñoz Rodríguez, 2022. "Friendly Residential Environments That Generate Autonomy in Older Persons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Francesco Cattaneo & Ilaria Buondonno & Debora Cravero & Francesca Sassi & Patrizia D’Amelio, 2022. "Musculoskeletal Diseases Role in the Frailty Syndrome: A Case–Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Inaihá Laureano Benincá & Maria Gattuso & Stefania Butti & Davide Caccia & Francesca Morganti, 2024. "Emotional Status, Motor Dysfunction, and Cognitive Functioning as Predictors of Quality of Life in Physically Engaged Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1325-:d:1493502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.