IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i9p5749-d1141837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Responses and Support Needs of Healthcare Professionals after Adverse or Traumatic Experiences in Healthcare—Evidence from Seminars on Peer Support

Author

Listed:
  • Katja Schrøder

    (Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark)

  • Elisabeth Assing Hvidt

    (Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify (i) emotions experienced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) after adverse or traumatic events and (ii) needs for support after adverse or traumatic events. Data for this qualitative, descriptive study were collected at 27 seminars for 198 HCPs introducing a peer-support programme after adverse or traumatic events (The Buddy Study). Through interactive exercises, participants shared their experiences, and this study reports on the responses of an exercise identifying emotions and needs after an adverse or traumatic event. The top five emotions were anger, guilt, impotence, grief, and frustration and anxiety, and the top five needs were to be met with understanding, recognition, listening, care, and respect. Ten categories of emotions experienced by HCPs after adverse or traumatic events were constructed, and the five categories with the highest number of mentions were anger and impotence, fear and insecurity, negative self-evaluation, guilt and shame, and alone and overloaded. Nine categories relating to needs for support after adverse or traumatic events were constructed, and the five categories with the highest number of mentions were: being seen and understood, compassion, being respected, time to recover, and organisational support. The emotional disclosure promoted at the peer seminars of the Buddy Study revealed that all participants share the same emotional distress, being either second victims or potential second victims. Moreover, the support needed was of a human-to-human nature that all participants felt capable of providing as a “buddy” for a colleague. Both the identified emotions and needs for support identified in this study may contribute to qualifying the development of the content of support programmes for HCPs after traumatic or adverse events.

Suggested Citation

  • Katja Schrøder & Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, 2023. "Emotional Responses and Support Needs of Healthcare Professionals after Adverse or Traumatic Experiences in Healthcare—Evidence from Seminars on Peer Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-9, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5749-:d:1141837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angel Cobos-Vargas & Pastora Pérez-Pérez & María Núñez-Núñez & Eloísa Casado-Fernández & Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, 2022. "Second Victim Support at the Core of Severe Adverse Event Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Isolde Martina Busch & Francesca Moretti & Irene Campagna & Roberto Benoni & Stefano Tardivo & Albert W. Wu & Michela Rimondini, 2021. "Promoting the Psychological Well-Being of Healthcare Providers Facing the Burden of Adverse Events: A Systematic Review of Second Victim Support Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maike Riegel & Victoria Klemm & Stefan Bushuven & Reinhard Strametz, 2022. "Self-Stigmatization of Healthcare Workers in Intensive Care, Acute, and Emergency Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Angel Cobos-Vargas & Pastora Pérez-Pérez & María Núñez-Núñez & Eloísa Casado-Fernández & Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, 2022. "Second Victim Support at the Core of Severe Adverse Event Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Isolde Martina Busch & Michela Rimondini, 2021. "Empowering Patients and Supporting Health Care Providers—New Avenues for High Quality Care and Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-5, September.
    4. Adriana López-Pineda & Irene Carrillo & Aurora Mula & Sofia Guerra-Paiva & Reinhard Strametz & Susanna Tella & Kris Vanhaecht & Massimiliano Panella & Bojana Knezevic & Marius-Ionut Ungureanu & Einav , 2022. "Strategies for the Psychological Support of the Healthcare Workforce during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The ERNST Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Lea Simms & Katherine E. Ottman & James L. Griffith & Michael G. Knight & Lorenzo Norris & Viktoriya Karakcheyeva & Brandon A. Kohrt, 2023. "Psychosocial Peer Support to Address Mental Health and Burnout of Health Care Workers Affected by COVID-19: A Qualitative Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Hartwig Marung & Reinhard Strametz & Hannah Roesner & Florian Reifferscheid & Rainer Petzina & Victoria Klemm & Milena Trifunovic-Koenig & Stefan Bushuven, 2023. "Second Victims among German Emergency Medical Services Physicians (SeViD-III-Study)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Milena Trifunovic-Koenig & Reinhard Strametz & Bianka Gerber & Sneha Mantri & Stefan Bushuven, 2022. "Validation of the German Version of the Moral Injury Symptom and Support Scale for Health Professionals (G-MISS-HP) and Its Correlation to the Second Victim Phenomenon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5749-:d:1141837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.