IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p5079-d1096388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Medication Review Competency in Undergraduate Pharmacy Training: A Self-Assessment by Third-Year Students

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksi Westerholm

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Katja Leiman

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Annika Kiiski

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Marika Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Anita Mistry

    (Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharmacy and Bank Building, Camperdown/Darlington Campus, University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW 2050, Australia)

  • Marja Airaksinen

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Viikinkaari 5 E, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

Pharmacists are increasingly involved in medication history taking, medication reconciliation, and review in their daily practice. The objectives of this study were to investigate third-year pharmacy students’ self-assessed competency in medication reviews and gather their feedback for further development of medication review training in their curriculum. The study was conducted as a self-assessment of third-year pharmacy students at the completion of their second three-month internship period in a community pharmacy in 2017–2018. The students were assigned to review medications of a real patient under the supervision of a medication review accredited pharmacist during their internship. The self-assessment was carried out via an e-form, which was created for this study. Recently established national medication review competence recommendations for pharmacists were used as a reference. Students ( n = 95, participation rate: 93%) self-assessed their competency as good or very good in 91% ( n = 28) of the competency areas listed in the self-assessment. The highest proportion of competencies that were self-assessed as good or very good included using medication risk management databases and evaluating the clinical importance of the information (97%, n = 92). The lowest proportion of competencies was found in applying clinical information from the key laboratory tests to patient care and knowing which laboratory tests are most important to monitor in each condition and medication (36%, n = 34). The students suggested that their pharmacy education should contain more medication review assignments as group work and that an elective course on medication reviews should be compulsory for all pharmacy students.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksi Westerholm & Katja Leiman & Annika Kiiski & Marika Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä & Anita Mistry & Marja Airaksinen, 2023. "Developing Medication Review Competency in Undergraduate Pharmacy Training: A Self-Assessment by Third-Year Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5079-:d:1096388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5079/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5079/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalia M. Dawoud & Alexander Haines & David Wonderling & Joanna Ashe & Jennifer Hill & Mihir Varia & Philip Dyer & Julian Bion, 2019. "Cost Effectiveness of Advanced Pharmacy Services Provided in the Community and Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(10), pages 1241-1260, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirsi Kvarnström & Ilona Niittynen & Sonja Kallio & Carita Lindén-Lahti & Marja Airaksinen & Lotta Schepel, 2023. "Developing an In-House Comprehensive Medication Review Training Program for Clinical Pharmacists in a Finnish Hospital Pharmacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5079-:d:1096388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.