IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4779-d1091438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condom-Related Stigma Scale among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Development and Psychometric Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Shen

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)

  • Ci Zhang

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)

  • Lloyd A. Goldsamt

    (Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA)

  • Wenwen Peng

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)

  • Run Wang

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)

  • Xianhong Li

    (Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)

Abstract

Condom-related stigma is a frequently mentioned barrier to consistent condom use among men who have sex with men (MSM). Based on the concept and operational definition of condom-related stigma recently defined by our team, we developed the 20-item condom-related stigma scale (CRSS) and examined its psychometric properties among 433 MSM in China, following DeVellis’s scale development guidelines. The content validity, convergent validity, empirical validity, factorial validity, scale score reliability, split-half reliability, and test–retest reliability for the CRSS were all assessed. The scale consists of four domains: perceived distrust, perceived potential HIV/STI risk, perceived embarrassment, and perceived violation of the traditional understanding of sexual intercourse. The CRSS has good validity (the scale-level content validity index was 0.99; the empirical validity was greater than 0.70) and high reliability (the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient overall was 0.926; the split-half reliability overall was 0.795; the test–retest reliability overall was 0.950). This scale is recommended for assessing the level of condom-related stigma among Chinese MSM, which can serve as an evaluating indicator for safer-sex interventions to prevent HIV infection among the MSM population in a Chinese cultural context.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Shen & Ci Zhang & Lloyd A. Goldsamt & Wenwen Peng & Run Wang & Xianhong Li, 2023. "Condom-Related Stigma Scale among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Development and Psychometric Tests," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4779-:d:1091438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Wu & Yifei Hu & Yujiang Jia & Yingying Su & Huixia Cui & Huixin Liu & Ning Wang, 2014. "Prevalence of Unprotected Anal Intercourse among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: An Updated Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-1, May.
    2. Jia Chen & Xianhong Li & Yang Xiong & Kristopher P. Fennie & Honghong Wang & Ann Bartley Williams, 2016. "Reducing the risk of HIV transmission among men who have sex with men: A feasibility study of the motivational interviewing counseling method," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 400-407, September.
    3. Stephen Neville & Jeffery Adams & Calvin Moorley & Debra Jackson, 2016. "The condom imperative in anal sex – one size may not fit all: a qualitative descriptive study of men who have sex with men," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(23-24), pages 3589-3596, December.
    4. Adam O Hill & Benjamin R Bavinton & Gregory Armstrong, 2018. "Prevalence and Factors Associated with Inconsistent Condom Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Who Use Mobile Geo-Social Networking Applications in Greater Tokyo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takeshi Miwa & Masazumi Yamaguchi & Tomoko Ohtsuki & Gaku Oshima & Chihiro Wakabayashi & Sachiko Nosaka & Kanna Hayashi & Yuzuru Ikushima & Masayoshi Tarui, 2023. "Associations between Drug Use and Sexual Risk Behaviours among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Japan: Results from the Cross-Sectional LASH Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Stuart Gilmour & Phuong Le Mai & Phuong Nguyen & Bibha Dhungel & Maki Tomizawa & Huy Nguyen, 2020. "Progress towards Health for All: Time to End Discrimination and Marginalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-5, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4779-:d:1091438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.