IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4702-d1089973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensory Integration for Postural Control in Rheumatoid Arthritis Revealed by Computerized Dynamic Posturography

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Cristina Rodrigues da Silva

    (College of Health and Sport Sciences, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88080-350, Brazil)

  • Deyse Borges Machado

    (College of Health and Sport Sciences, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88080-350, Brazil)

  • Luis Mochizuki

    (School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 03828-000, Brazil)

  • Melissa Andrea Jeannet Michaelsen Cardoso

    (College of Health and Sport Sciences, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88080-350, Brazil)

  • Juliane de Oliveira

    (College of Health and Sport Sciences, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88080-350, Brazil)

  • Monique da Silva Gevaerd

    (College of Health and Sport Sciences, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88080-350, Brazil)

  • Ulysses Fernandes Ervilha

    (School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 03828-000, Brazil)

  • Monique Oliveira Baptista Cajueiro

    (School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 03828-000, Brazil)

  • Susana Cristina Domenech

    (College of Distance Learning, State University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88035-001, Brazil)

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease that impairs mobility. How does sensory information influence postural responses in people with RA? The aim of this study was to evaluate the postural control of people with RA during a sensory organization test, comparing how sensory information influences postural responses in people with rheumatoid arthritis compared with healthy people. Participants were 28 women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA group) and 16 women without any rheumatoid disease (Control group CG). The Sensory Organization Test (SOT) was performed on a Smart Balance Master ® (NeuroCom International, Inc., Clackamas, OR, USA) and center of pressure (COP) was measured. SOT conditions: SOT1 (eyes open, fixed support surface and surround; SOT2) eyes closed, fixed support surface and surround; and SOT5) eyes closed, sway-referenced support surface, and fixed surround. To compare the demographic and clinical aspects between groups, independent t -test or Mann–Whitney’s U-test were used. Differences were found between groups. Between SOT conditions, for CG and RA, COP was faster for SOT-5 than SOT-1, while SOT-1 and SOT-2 presented similar COP velocity. For SOT-2 and SOT-5, COP was larger for the RA group. For both groups, SOT-1 presented the smallest COP, and SOT-5 showed the largest COP.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Cristina Rodrigues da Silva & Deyse Borges Machado & Luis Mochizuki & Melissa Andrea Jeannet Michaelsen Cardoso & Juliane de Oliveira & Monique da Silva Gevaerd & Ulysses Fernandes Ervilha & Mon, 2023. "Sensory Integration for Postural Control in Rheumatoid Arthritis Revealed by Computerized Dynamic Posturography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4702-:d:1089973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4702-:d:1089973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.