IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4628-d1088693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges in Drug Surveillance: Strengthening the Analysis of New Psychoactive Substances by Harmonizing Drug Checking Services in Proficiency Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Margot Balcaen

    (Unit Illicit Drugs, Lifestyle and Chronic Diseases, Scientific Direction Epidemiology, Sciensano, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Mireia Ventura

    (Energy Control, Associació Benestar i Desenvolupament, 08041 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Cristina Gil

    (Energy Control, Associació Benestar i Desenvolupament, 08041 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Anton Luf

    (Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Daniel Martins

    (Kosmicare, 1170-283 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Mar Cunha

    (Kosmicare, 1170-283 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Karsten Tögel-Lins

    (Legal-high-Inhaltsstoffe, 60439 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Danny Wolf

    (Legal-high-Inhaltsstoffe, 60439 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Peter Blanckaert

    (Unit Illicit Drugs, Lifestyle and Chronic Diseases, Scientific Direction Epidemiology, Sciensano, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Eric Deconinck

    (Service Medicines and Health Products, Scientific Direction Physical and Chemical Health Risks, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

Background: Drug checking is a proven harm reduction strategy and provides real-time information on the market of new psychoactive substances (NPS). It combines chemical analysis of samples with direct engagement with people who use drugs (PWUD), giving the ability to increase preparedness and responsiveness towards NPS. Next to that, it supports rapid identification of potential unwitting consumption. However, NPS cause a toxicological battle for the researchers, as factors such as the unpredictability and quick shift of the market complicate the detection. Methods: To evaluate challenges posed towards drug checking services, proficiency testing was set up to evaluate existing analytical techniques and investigate the capability to correctly identify circulating NPS. Twenty blind substances, covering the most common categories of substances, were analyzed according to the existing protocols of the existing drug checking services, including several analytical methods such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography with diode array detector (LC-DAD). Results: The proficiency test scores range from 80 to 97.5% accuracy. The most common issues and errors are mainly unidentified compounds, presumably due to no up-to-date libraries, and/ or confusion between structural isomers, such as 3- and 4-chloroethcathinone, or structural analogs, such as MIPLA (N-methyl-N-isopropyl lysergamide) and LSD (D-lysergic acid diethylamide). Conclusions: The participating drug checking services have access to adequate analytical tools to provide feedback to drug users and provide up-to-date information on NPS.

Suggested Citation

  • Margot Balcaen & Mireia Ventura & Cristina Gil & Anton Luf & Daniel Martins & Mar Cunha & Karsten Tögel-Lins & Danny Wolf & Peter Blanckaert & Eric Deconinck, 2023. "Challenges in Drug Surveillance: Strengthening the Analysis of New Psychoactive Substances by Harmonizing Drug Checking Services in Proficiency Testing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4628-:d:1088693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4628-:d:1088693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.