IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4038-d1078992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Performance Evaluation of E-Health before and after the Pandemic Era: A Literature Review and Future Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Biancuzzi

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Francesca Dal Mas

    (Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Chiara Bidoli

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Veronica Pegoraro

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Maristella Zantedeschi

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Pietro Antonio Negro

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Stefano Campostrini

    (Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Cobianchi

    (Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
    General Surgery Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
    ITIR—Institute for Transformative Innovation Research, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

Abstract

E-Health represents one of the pillars of the modern healthcare system and a strategy involving the use of digital and telemedicine tools to provide assistance to an increasing number of patients, reducing, at the same time, healthcare costs. Measuring and understanding the economic value and performance of e-Health tools is, therefore, essential to understanding the outcome and best uses of such technologies. The aim of this paper is to determine the most frequently used methods for measuring the economic value and the performance of services in the framework of e-Health, considering different pathologies. An in-depth analysis of 20 recent articles, rigorously selected from more than 5000 contributions, underlines a great interest from the clinical community in economic and performance-related topics. Several diseases are the object of detailed clinical trials and protocols, leading to various economic outcomes, especially in the COVID-19 post-pandemic era. Many e-Health tools are mentioned in the studies, especially those that appear more frequently in people’s lives outside of the clinical setting, such as apps and web portals, which allow for clinicians to keep in contact with their patients. While such e-Health tools and programs are increasingly studied from practical perspectives, such as in the case of Virtual Hospital frameworks, there is a lack of consensus regarding the recommended models to map and report their economic outcomes and performance. More investigations and guidelines by scientific societies are advised to understand the potential and path of such an evolving and promising phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Biancuzzi & Francesca Dal Mas & Chiara Bidoli & Veronica Pegoraro & Maristella Zantedeschi & Pietro Antonio Negro & Stefano Campostrini & Lorenzo Cobianchi, 2023. "Economic and Performance Evaluation of E-Health before and after the Pandemic Era: A Literature Review and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4038-:d:1078992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah J Iribarren & Kenrick Cato & Louise Falzon & Patricia W Stone, 2017. "What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Guthrie, James & Ricceri, Federica & Dumay, John, 2012. "Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 68-82.
    3. Zartashia Ghani & Johan Jarl & Johan Sanmartin Berglund & Martin Andersson & Peter Anderberg, 2020. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Mobile Health (mHealth) Interventions for Older Adults: Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Ralf Birkemeyer & Alfred Müller & Steffen Wahler & Johann-Matthias Schulenburg, 2020. "A cost-effectiveness analysis model of Preventicus atrial fibrillation screening from the point of view of statutory health insurance in Germany," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-01-2015-1939 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ghosh, Swapan & Hughes, Mat & Hodgkinson, Ian & Hughes, Paul, 2022. "Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Bonder, Seth & Zajtchuk, Russ, 1997. "Changing the paradigm for telemedicine development and evaluation: a prospective model-based approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 257-280, December.
    8. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Maurizio Massaro & John Dumay & James Guthrie, 2016. "On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 767-801, June.
    10. Abdel-Basset, Mohamed & Chang, Victor & Nabeeh, Nada A., 2021. "An intelligent framework using disruptive technologies for COVID-19 analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judit Vitéz-Durgula & Anna Dunay & Gergő Thalmeiner & Balázs Vajai & László Pataki, 2023. "Financial Analysis and Survival Research of the Visegrad Countries’ Health Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    2. Mohammed Adel Elzahaby, 2023. "Corporate narrative disclosure practices in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 296-315, September.
    3. Marco Bisogno & Francesca Citro & Serena Santis & Aurelio Tommasetti, 2017. "Disclosure Quality Measurement in the Public Sector: A Structured Literature Review," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 119-119, November.
    4. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & Tsoligkas, Fanis & Evans, Lisa, 2020. "Compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements: A structured literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    6. Ilenia Ascani & Roberta Ciccola & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2021. "A Structured Literature Review about the Role of Management Accountants in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    8. Simon Segal & James Guthrie & Johannes Dumay, 2021. "Stakeholder and merger and acquisition research: a structured literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2935-2964, June.
    9. Charl de Villiers & Matteo La Torre & Vida Botes, 2022. "Accounting and social capital: A review and reflections on future research opportunities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4485-4521, December.
    10. Knudsen, Dan-Richard, 2020. "Elusive boundaries, power relations, and knowledge production: A systematic review of the literature on digitalization in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    11. Helena Biancuzzi & Francesca Dal Mas & Valerio Brescia & Stefano Campostrini & Marco Cascella & Arturo Cuomo & Lorenzo Cobianchi & Ander Dorken-Gallastegi & Anthony Gebran & Haytham M. Kaafarani & Fra, 2022. "Opioid Misuse: A Review of the Main Issues, Challenges, and Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Tatiana Garanina & Henri Hussinki & Johannes Dumay, 2021. "Accounting for intangibles and intellectual capital: a literature review from 2000 to 2020," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5111-5140, December.
    13. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    14. Diego Chambergo-Michilot & Walter Andree Tellez & Naysha Becerra-Chauca & Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka & Alvaro Taype-Rondan, 2020. "Text message reminders for improving sun protection habits: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Massaro, Maurizio, 2023. "Digital transformation in the healthcare sector through blockchain technology. Insights from academic research and business developments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Secundo, Giustina & Ndou, Valentina & Vecchio, Pasquale Del & De Pascale, Gianluigi, 2020. "Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: A structured literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Luca Mazzara & Francesco Bergamaschi & Giulia Leoni, 2022. "Gestione integrata dei dati e misurazione della performance nei network inter-municipali: un?analisi sistematica della letteratura," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 91-116.
    18. Angreine Kewo & Pinrolinvic D. K. Manembu & Per Sieverts Nielsen, 2023. "A Rigorous Standalone Literature Review of Residential Electricity Load Profiles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    19. Issam Benhayoun & M. Marghich Abdellatif, 2017. "IFRS for SMEs: A Structured Literature Review [International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting]," Post-Print hal-01910461, HAL.
    20. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4038-:d:1078992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.