IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p3999-d1078199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Internet+ Recycling” Platform Participation Selection Strategy in a Two-Echelon Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Zhangwei Feng

    (School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Deyan Yang

    (Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xintian Wang

    (National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China)

Abstract

Compared with traditional offline recycling channel, recycling through the “Internet+ recycling” platform has increasingly attracted the academic and practical intention in the past decade because of its accessibility and convenience. To promote the recycling initiatives and construct sustainable operations, how to stimulate supply chain stakeholders participating in the online recycling becomes a challenge issue. This paper considers one supplier, one manufacturer, and one third-party recycler (3PR) in a two-echelon remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain with an “Internet+ recycling” platform, in which consumers can access the online recycling platform and make an appointment for recycling without a physical visit. The manufacturer has three choices: either do not participate or participate with one of two strategies: cost-sharing ( CS ) or active promotion ( AP ) strategy. We develop a Stackelberg game model to study the motivation of the manufacturer to participate in the “Internet+ recycling” platform and the influence mechanism of key factors. The key findings include the following: (1) compared with the case without the “Internet+ recycling” platform, when the proportion of cost sharing for the 3PR is low, strategy CS contributes to the improvement of the 3PR’s performance; (2) in the presence of two participation strategies, when the disassembly rate is low enough, the manufacturer prefers strategy AP ; otherwise, he selects strategy CS ; and (3) a high proportion of cost sharing for the manufacturer or low promotion effort cost can increase the whole profit of the closed-loop supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhangwei Feng & Deyan Yang & Xintian Wang, 2023. "“Internet+ Recycling” Platform Participation Selection Strategy in a Two-Echelon Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3999-:d:1078199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Yanting & Wang, Zongjun, 2017. "Values of information sharing: A comparison of supplier-remanufacturing and manufacturer-remanufacturing scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 20-44.
    2. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    3. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    4. Long, Qingqi & Tao, Xiaoying & Chen, Yunting & Chen, Yingni & Xu, Le & Zhang, Shuzhu & Zhang, Jie, 2022. "Exploring combined effects of dominance structure, green sensitivity, and green preference on manufacturing closed-loop supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Chen, Lei, 2022. "Creating all-win by blockchain in a remanufacturing supply chain with consumer risk-aversion and quality untrust," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Zhangwei Feng & Na Luo & Yanping Liu, 2021. "Trade-in Strategy and Competition between Two Independent Remanufacturers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Baptiste Lebreton, 2007. "Strategic Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-38908-8, October.
    8. Xiong, Yu & Zhao, Quanwu & Zhou, Yu, 2016. "Manufacturer-remanufacturing vs supplier-remanufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 21-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huanyong Zhang & Ningshu Li & Jinghan Lin, 2024. "Modeling the Decision and Coordination Mechanism of Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chain Using Markov Decision Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Huang, Yanting & Wang, Zongjun, 2017. "Values of information sharing: A comparison of supplier-remanufacturing and manufacturer-remanufacturing scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 20-44.
    3. Xin Lu & Fangchao Xu & Fan Qin, 2024. "Remanufacturing Operations in Different Financial Ownership Structures with Consideration of the Upwards Supplier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.
    5. Reimann, Marc & Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 510-518.
    6. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Yang, Zhen & He, Zhengwen & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 155-166.
    7. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    8. Ramani, Vinay & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2017. "A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of DellReconnect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1009-1027.
    9. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Yu, Xinhu, 2024. "Purchasing new for remanufacturing: Sourcing co-opetition, tax-planning and data validation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    10. Maiti, T. & Giri, B.C., 2017. "Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 259-272.
    11. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    12. Xiaofeng Long & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Yan Yang, 2017. "Strategy Analysis of Recycling and Remanufacturing by Remanufacturers in Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    13. Tong Shu & Qian Liu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai, 2018. "Pricing Decisions of CSR Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Carbon Emission Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Weisheng Deng, 2019. "Does Remanufacturing Always Benefit the Manufacturer and Hurt the Supplier?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Tong Shu & Yongjian Wang & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Yan Yang, 2017. "Decisions on Remanufacturing with WTP Disparity and Recycling Competition under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-29, August.
    16. Yang, Feng & Wang, Manman & Ang, Sheng, 2021. "Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers’ anticipated regret and power structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Zhangwei Feng & Na Luo & Yanping Liu, 2021. "Trade-in Strategy and Competition between Two Independent Remanufacturers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Ze-Bin Wang & Yao-Yu Wang & Jian-Cai Wang, 2016. "Optimal distribution channel strategy for new and remanufactured products," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 269-295, June.
    19. Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Deng, Qianzhou & Feng, Lipan, 2019. "Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 217-228.
    20. Ma, Xueli & Mao, Jinyue & Luo, Qian & Bai, Qingguo, 2024. "Effects of information superiority and green optimism on green supply chains under different power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3999-:d:1078199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.