Author
Listed:
- Rita Fabiane Teixeira Gomes
(Department of Oral Pathology, Faculdade de Odontologia, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil)
- Jean Schmith
(Polytechnic School, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil
Technology in Automation and Electronics Laboratory—TECAE Lab, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- Rodrigo Marques de Figueiredo
(Polytechnic School, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil
Technology in Automation and Electronics Laboratory—TECAE Lab, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- Samuel Armbrust Freitas
(Department of Applied Computing, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- Giovanna Nunes Machado
(Polytechnic School, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos—UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)
- Juliana Romanini
(Oral Medicine, Otorhynolaringology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil)
- Vinicius Coelho Carrard
(Department of Oral Pathology, Faculdade de Odontologia, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil
Oral Medicine, Otorhynolaringology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil
TelessaudeRS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil)
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence has generated a significant impact in the health field. The aim of this study was to perform the training and validation of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model to automatically classify six clinical representation categories of oral lesion images. Method: The CNN model was developed with the objective of automatically classifying the images into six categories of elementary lesions: (1) papule/nodule; (2) macule/spot; (3) vesicle/bullous; (4) erosion; (5) ulcer and (6) plaque. We selected four architectures and using our dataset we decided to test the following architectures: ResNet-50, VGG16, InceptionV3 and Xception. We used the confusion matrix as the main metric for the CNN evaluation and discussion. Results: A total of 5069 images of oral mucosa lesions were used. The oral elementary lesions classification reached the best result using an architecture based on InceptionV3. After hyperparameter optimization, we reached more than 71% correct predictions in all six lesion classes. The classification achieved an average accuracy of 95.09% in our dataset. Conclusions: We reported the development of an artificial intelligence model for the automated classification of elementary lesions from oral clinical images, achieving satisfactory performance. Future directions include the study of including trained layers to establish patterns of characteristics that determine benign, potentially malignant and malignant lesions.
Suggested Citation
Rita Fabiane Teixeira Gomes & Jean Schmith & Rodrigo Marques de Figueiredo & Samuel Armbrust Freitas & Giovanna Nunes Machado & Juliana Romanini & Vinicius Coelho Carrard, 2023.
"Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Elementary Oral Lesions from Clinical Images,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3894-:d:1076616
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3894-:d:1076616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.