IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3755-d1074721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Ye

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Daniel Vala

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Hayden Walker

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Victor Gaza

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Vinz Umali

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Patrick Brodoff

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Nathan Gockel

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

  • Masatoshi Nakamura

    (Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata 950-3198, Japan)

Abstract

We aim to examine the cross-education effects of unilateral muscle neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training combined with illusionary mirror visual feedback (MVF). Fifteen adults (NMES + MVF: 5; NMES: 5, Control: 5) completed this study. The experimental groups completed a 3-week NMES training on their dominant elbow flexor muscle. The NMES + MVF group had a mirror placed in the midsagittal plane between their upper arms, so a visual illusion was created in which their non-dominant arms appeared to be stimulated. Baseline and post-training measurements included both arms’ isometric strength, voluntary activation level, and resting twitch. Cross-education effects were not observed from all dependent variables. For the unilateral muscle, both experimental groups showed greater strength increases when compared to the control (isometric strength % changes: NMES + MVF vs. NMES vs. Control = 6.31 ± 4.56% vs. 4.72 ± 8.97% vs. −4.04 ± 3.85%, p < 0.05). Throughout the training, even with the maximally tolerated NMES, the NMES + MVF group had greater perceived exertion and discomfort than the NMES. Additionally, the NMES-evoked force increased throughout the training for both groups. Our data does not support that NMES combined with or without MVF induces cross-education. However, the stimulated muscle becomes more responsive to the NMES and can become stronger following the training.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Ye & Daniel Vala & Hayden Walker & Victor Gaza & Vinz Umali & Patrick Brodoff & Nathan Gockel & Masatoshi Nakamura, 2023. "Effects of Unilateral Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Illusionary Mirror Visual Feedback on the Contralateral Muscle: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3755-:d:1074721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3755-:d:1074721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.