IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3473-d1070286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of “Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model (PBPK)” New Approach Methodology (NAM) in Pharmaceuticals and Environmental Chemical Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Deepika Deepika

    (Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Departament d’Enginyeria Quimica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain
    Pere Virgili Health Research Institute (IISPV), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Catalonia, Spain)

  • Vikas Kumar

    (Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Departament d’Enginyeria Quimica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain
    Pere Virgili Health Research Institute (IISPV), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Catalonia, Spain)

Abstract

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are mechanistic tools generally employed in the pharmaceutical industry and environmental health risk assessment. These models are recognized by regulatory authorities for predicting organ concentration–time profiles, pharmacokinetics and daily intake dose of xenobiotics. The extension of PBPK models to capture sensitive populations such as pediatric, geriatric, pregnant females, fetus, etc., and diseased populations such as those with renal impairment, liver cirrhosis, etc., is a must. However, the current modelling practices and existing models are not mature enough to confidently predict the risk in these populations. A multidisciplinary collaboration between clinicians, experimental and modeler scientist is vital to improve the physiology and calculation of biochemical parameters for integrating knowledge and refining existing PBPK models. Specific PBPK covering compartments such as cerebrospinal fluid and the hippocampus are required to gain mechanistic understanding about xenobiotic disposition in these sub-parts. The PBPK model assists in building quantitative adverse outcome pathways (qAOPs) for several endpoints such as developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. Machine learning algorithms can predict physicochemical parameters required to develop in silico models where experimental data are unavailable. Integrating machine learning with PBPK carries the potential to revolutionize the field of drug discovery and development and environmental risk. Overall, this review tried to summarize the recent developments in the in-silico models, building of qAOPs and use of machine learning for improving existing models, along with a regulatory perspective. This review can act as a guide for toxicologists who wish to build their careers in kinetic modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Deepika Deepika & Vikas Kumar, 2023. "The Role of “Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model (PBPK)” New Approach Methodology (NAM) in Pharmaceuticals and Environmental Chemical Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3473-:d:1070286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pearce, Robert G. & Setzer, R. Woodrow & Strope, Cory L. & Sipes, Nisha S. & Wambaugh, John F., 2017. "httk: R Package for High-Throughput Toxicokinetics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 79(i04).
    2. Leona H. Clark & R. Woodrow Setzer & Hugh A. Barton, 2004. "Framework for Evaluation of Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Use in Safety or Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1697-1717, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Wambaugh & Imran Shah, 2010. "Simulating Microdosimetry in a Virtual Hepatic Lobule," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Jiaqi Ding & Wenxin Liu & Hong Zhang & Lingyan Zhu & Lin Zhu & Jianfeng Feng, 2021. "Liver-Based Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Exposure to Organophosphate Esters via Dust Ingestion Using a Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic (PBTK) Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Dustin F Kapraun & John F Wambaugh & R Woodrow Setzer & Richard S Judson, 2019. "Empirical models for anatomical and physiological changes in a human mother and fetus during pregnancy and gestation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-56, May.
    4. Eva D. McLanahan & Paul White & Lynn Flowers & Paul M. Schlosser, 2014. "The Use of PBPK Models to Inform Human Health Risk Assessment: Case Study on Perchlorate and Radioiodide Human Lifestage Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 356-366, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3473-:d:1070286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.