IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2310-d1049012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Postoperative Recovery between Balanced and Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind Randomized Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dongho Kang

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun 58128, Chonnam, Republic of Korea)

  • Minji Kim

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun 58128, Chonnam, Republic of Korea)

  • Hong-Beom Bae

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medical School, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea)

  • Seonho Moon

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea)

  • Joungmin Kim

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medical School, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Recovery after anesthesia has a significant impact on a patient’s return to daily life. This study was performed to compare the postoperative quality of recovery according to the method of anesthesia administered among patients undergoing OPCAB using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire. This single-blind, prospective study (trial number: KCT0004726) was performed using a population of 102 patients undergoing OPCAB under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a computer-generated list: a total intravenous anesthesia group (Group T) and a balanced anesthesia group (Group B). The QoR-40K score was measured preoperatively and at 24 and 48 h after extubation. There was no significant difference in the QoR-40K scores between the groups at 24 and 48 h after extubation. In addition, there were no significant differences between groups with respect to any of the five dimensions of QoR-40K at 24 and 48 h after extubation. Finally, there were no differences in the postoperative opioid consumption, time to extubation, or length of hospital stay. In this study, there was no difference in the QoR-40K score at 24 h after extubation between Groups T and B. Therefore, both methods of anesthesia are suitable for use when performing OPCAB.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongho Kang & Minji Kim & Hong-Beom Bae & Seonho Moon & Joungmin Kim, 2023. "Comparison of Postoperative Recovery between Balanced and Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind Randomized St," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2310-:d:1049012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2310/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Shui & Ziyi Xue & Xiaolei Miao & Changwei Wei & Anshi Wu, 2021. "Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anesthesia for quality of recovery in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2310-:d:1049012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.